Ashton and Sullivan
55
|
USA |
Multiple case studies |
Mental health care |
Confidentiality |
Baldini et al.
38
|
Italy, Netherlands |
Review and concept paper |
Lifestyle |
Privacy, data protection, psychological biases, accountability, digital divide |
Boers et al.
36
|
Netherlands, UK |
Review and opinion paper |
Primary care |
Ethical tensions, explicability, patient-provider relationship, responsibility, autonomy, disparities, digital divide |
Bourla et al.
45
|
France |
Observational mixed methods study |
Mental care |
Pre-emptive medical intervention, reinforcing anwety instead of providing a feeling of safety, stigmatization, provider-patient relationship |
Brill et al.
49
|
USA |
Review and opinion paper |
Care |
Autonomy, privacy, beneficence, ethical tension, provider-patient relationship |
Brisson et al.
33
|
USA |
Concept paper |
Education |
Privacy |
Carter et al.
35
|
Australia |
Review and opinion paper |
Breast cancer care |
Professional ethics, responsibility, explicability, bias in data sets, consent, privacy, confidentiality |
Davenport and Kalakota
25
|
USA |
Review and opinion paper |
Care |
Algorithmic transparency and explicability, biases in data, accountability |
Lie Kiel et al.
31
|
USA, Haiti |
Case study |
Care |
Privacy, security |
Duckett
29
|
Australia |
Case study |
Care |
Ownership of health information, threats to illegal access to health information |
tberlin et al.
52
|
USA |
Review and opinion paper |
Plastic surgery |
Privacy, security, identity |
Erikainen et al.
28
|
UK |
Review and opinion paper |
Care and lifestyle |
Ethical tension, digital divide, disparities, data ownership, quality of data |
Evans and Whicher
47
|
USA |
Review and opinion paper |
Research and care |
Explicability, data integrity, privacy, and confidentiality |
Galvin et al.
48
|
USA |
Review and opinion paper |
Care and research |
Democratization, co-creation of knowledge |
Gensheimer et al.
54
|
USA |
Guidelines |
Care and research |
Consent |
Gooding
46
|
Australia |
Review and opinion paper |
Mental care |
Transparency, harm minimization, accountability, privacy, and security |
Graham et al.
26
|
USA |
Review and opinion paper |
Mental care |
Biases in data (subjectivity), ethical problems due to poor digital literacy |
Ho and Quick
57
|
Canada, USA, UK |
Review |
Care |
Safety, patient-provider relationship |
Lenca et al.
56
|
Switzerland, USA |
Review |
Care of dementia patients |
Autonomy, privacy, beneficence, non-maleficence, interdependence, justice |
Kogetsu et al.
21
|
Japan |
Concept paper |
Research |
Privacy, data protection, autonomy (own intent) |
Kuhnel
53
|
USA |
Case study and review |
Mental care |
Privacy, confidentiality, loss of information control, provider-patient relationship (trust), integrity and validity, patient consent |
Laurie
58
|
UK |
Review and case study |
Research and care |
Privacy, public benefit, transparency, accountability, trustworthiness |
Lehmann et al.
23
|
USA |
Concept and consensus paper |
Care |
Informed consent |
Loftus et al.
37
|
USA |
Review and opinion paper |
Surgical care |
Algorithmic bias, accountability in case of errors |
Macdonald et al.
50
|
Canada, UK |
Observational qualitative study |
Care |
Provider-patient relationship |
Mars et al.
51
|
South Africa, Canada |
Review and opinion paper |
Dermatology care |
Responsibility, provider-patient relationship, consent, confidentiality, security, professional ethics |
McBride et al.
40
|
USA |
Review and opinion paper |
(nursing) care |
Professional ethics, ethical tension, moral distress, data integrity |
McWilliams et al.
20
|
UK |
Concept paper |
Research |
Confidentiality, beneficence (common good) |
Meredith et al.
30
|
Australia, UK |
Review and case study |
Adolescents care |
Consent, autonomy, privacy and confidentiality, ethical tension |
Moscatelli et al.
22
|
Italy |
System description |
Research |
Privacy and confidentiality |
Musher et al.
39
|
USA |
Case studies |
Care |
Fraud/data integrity, professional ethics |
Natsiavas et al.
43
|
Greece |
Observational quantitative study |
Care |
Informed consent (autonomy), confidentiality |
Pathak and Chou
44
|
USA |
Discussion paper |
Adolescents care |
Confidentiality, ethical tension |
Rashidi et al.
27
|
USA |
Review and opinion paper |
Pain research |
Patient-physician relationship |
Robichaux et al.
41
|
USA |
Review and opinion paper |
Care |
Stigmatization and biases, technomoral virtues humility (to know the limits), patient-provider relationship, justice, data integrity, moral leadership |
Sanchez et al.
34
|
Spain |
Review of guidelines |
Research |
Consent, privacy, beneficence (common good) |
Sanelli-Russo et al.
24
|
USA |
Concept paper |
Care |
Clinical ethics consultation |
Stockdale et al.
42
|
UK, Ireland |
Systematic review |
Research |
Privacy, security, trust, consent |
Wilburn
32
|
USA |
Case study |
Education |
Confidentiality, ethical tension |