Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 17;12:7321–7330. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S216605

Table 1.

Front-Line Therapies Targeting VEGF and mTOR Pathways in mRCC

Drug Advantages Disadvantages
Sorafenib Improves PFS (5.5 vs 2.8 months) Less tolerable than sunitinib or pazopanib
Sunitinib Improves PFS (11 vs 5 months)
Good ORR 47%
Lack of OS benefit
Temsirolimus Improves OS (10. 9 vs 7.3 months)
Good option for intermediate- to poor-risk mRCC and non-clear cell histology
Weekly IV dosing
Lack of objective responses by RECIST criteria
Bevacizumab + IFN-α Improves PFS (10.2 vs 5.4 months) IFN-α is not well-tolerated
No OS benefit
Pazopanib Improves PFS (9.2 vs 4.2 months)
Noninferior to sunitinib (COMPARZ)
Higher incidence of hepatotoxicity
Cabozantinib Improves PFS (8.6 vs 5.3 months) Not an option for good-risk mRCC

Abbreviations: VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; mTOR, mammalian target of rapamycin; mRCC, metastatic renal cell carcinoma; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; ORR, overall response rate; IFN-α, interferon-alpha.