Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 22;106(3):536–553. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2020.08.016

Table I.

Characteristics of studies included in this systematic review of microwave- and heat-based decontamination of N95 filtering facepiece respirators

First author Year Region of origin Number of decontamination conditionsa
Number of inoculation conditionsa (varied parameter) Number of unique N95 models Outcomes evaluated
MW Heat Aerosol penetration Airflow resistance Germicidal effect (pathogen) Fit Physical traits
Bergman 2010 USA 1 1 6 Yes Yes No No Yes
Bergman 2011 USA 1 1 3 No No No Yes Yes
Fischer 2020 USA 4 1 2 No No Yes (SARS-CoV-2) Yes No
Fisher 2009 USA 5 2 (inoculation medium) 1 No No Yes (MS2) No No
Fisher 2011 USA 2 1 6 Yes No Yes (MS2) No Yes
Heimbuch 2011 USA 1 1 2 (transmission mode) 6 No No Yes (H1N1) No Yes
Kumar 2020 Canada 1 1 4 No No Yes (SARS-CoV-2) Yes Yes
Lin 2017 Taiwan 2 1 Yes Yes No No Yes
Lin 2018 Taiwan 2 1 1 No No Yes (Bacillus subtilis) No No
Lore 2012 USA 1 1 1 2 Yes No Yes (H5N1) No No
Viscusi 2007 USA 2 4 1 Yes No No No Yes
Viscusi 2009 USA 1 5 6 Yes Yes (MW only) No No Yes
Viscusi 2011 USA 1 1 6 No No No Yes Yes

MW, microwave.

a

Numbers of decontamination and inoculation conditions were determined by the authors of this systematic review. Distinct decontamination conditions were defined as any treatments with differing parameters (e.g., variable temperature or duration) excluding different numbers of cycles. Distinct inoculation conditions included the use of different inoculation media or variable modes of transmission (i.e. droplet versus aerosol).