Table II.
Microwave and heat intervention parameters and N95 filtering facepiece respirators for which post-decontamination performance outcomes (aerosol penetration and airflow resistance) were evaluated
First author, year | Powera/Temperature | Time | Cycles | Moisture | Pressure | N95 models | Performance outcomes | Summary of resultsb | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Microwave |
Bergman, 2010 |
750 W/ft3 |
120 s |
3 |
MGS |
Room |
3M 8000c 3M 8210c Moldex 2201c |
KC PFR95-174c 3M 1860c 3M 1870c |
Aerosol penetration Airflow resistance |
%P<3 for all models AR <15 mmH2O for all models |
Fisher, 2011 | 750 W/ft3 | 90 s | 1 or 3 | MGS, steam bag Xd | Room | Cardinal Health 3M 8210 Moldex 2200 |
KC PFR95 3M 1860 3M 1870 |
Aerosol penetration | %P<5 for all models/conditions | |
3 |
MGS, steam bag Yd |
|||||||||
Lore, 2012 |
1250 We |
120 s |
1 |
MGS |
Room |
3M 1860 3M 1870 |
Aerosol penetration |
%P<2 for all models |
||
Viscusi, 2007 | 750 W/ft3 | 120 s | 1 | Dry | Room | 3M 8000c | Aerosol penetration | %P<2 for all conditions | ||
240 s | ||||||||||
Viscusi, 2009 |
750 W/ft3 |
120 s |
1 |
Dry |
Room |
3M 8000c 3M 8210c Moldex 2200c |
KC PFR95-270c 3M 1860c 3M 1870c |
Aerosol penetration Airflow resistance |
%P<2 for all models AR ≤9 mmH2O for all models (3M 1870 not measured due to melting) |
|
Heat | Bergman, 2010 |
60°C |
30 min |
3 |
MHI (80% RH) |
Room |
3M 8000c 3M 8210c Moldex 2201c |
KC PFR95-174c 3M 1860c 3M 1870c |
Aerosol penetration Airflow resistance |
%P<3 for all models AR ≤15 mmH2O for all models |
Lin, 2017 | 149–164°C |
3 min |
1 |
Dry |
Room |
3M 8210 | Aerosol penetration Airflow resistance |
%P<3 for all conditions AR <11 mmH2O for all conditions |
||
121°C |
15 min |
1 |
Steam (autoclave) |
1.06 kg/cm2 |
||||||
Lore, 2012 |
65°C |
20 min |
1 |
MHI (RH unspecified) |
Room |
3M 1860 3M 1870 |
Aerosol penetration |
%P<2 for all models |
||
Viscusi, 2007 | 80°C | 60 min | 1 | Dry | Room | 3M 8000c | Aerosol penetration | 80°C: %P<1 160°C: mask not measured due to melting |
||
160°C | ||||||||||
121°C | 15 min | 1 | Steam (autoclave) | 1.05 kg/cm2 | Autoclave: %P>18 for both conditions | |||||
30 min | ||||||||||
Viscusi, 2009 | 80°C | 60 min | 1 | Dry | Room | 3M 8000c 3M 8210c Moldex 2200c |
KC PFR95-270c 3M 1860c 3M 1870c |
Aerosol penetration | 80–100°C: %P ≤ 2 for all models 110–120°C: %P<5 for all models except KC PFR95-270 at 110°C (%P=5.4)f |
|
90°C | ||||||||||
100°C | ||||||||||
110°C | ||||||||||
120°C |
%P, percentage aerosol penetration; AR, airflow resistance; KC, Kimberly–Clark; MGS, microwave-generated steam; MHI, moist heat incubation; RH, relative humidity.
If both manufacturer-rated and experimentally-determined microwave power were provided, the experimental value is reported here.
Greater-/less-than values are reported to the nearest whole number. Outcome successes are defined as aerosol penetration <5% and airflow resistance <25 mmH2O.
Mask models were anonymized in article. Model names were obtained by e-mail from R. Shaffer in April 2020.
Steam Bag X = Medela Quick Clean™ MICRO-STEAM™ BAGS; Steam Bag Y = Munchkin® Steam Guard™ Bags.
Power units per volume not specified.
Data for the KC PFR95-270 at 110oC was obtained from only one replicate instead of three due to melting of the other two.