Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 7;9(2):44. doi: 10.1167/tvst.9.2.44

Table 2B.

DAPHNE's Performance on External Validations: Sensitivity, Specificity and Corresponding 95% CIs for Referral Level Output to Detect Referral, PDR and DME, and PDR Level Output to Detect PDR on the Saudi Arabian Dataset

Disease Level Daphne Predicted Results Sensitivity Specificity
Referral vs. Non- Referral Referral 97.1% (95.1%–97.25%) 90.33% (85.71%–92.17%)
PDR 100% (94.5%–100%)
DME 100% (94.5%–100%)
PDR vs. Non-PDR PDR 98.23% (93.3%–99.6%) 83.78% (82.12%–88.87%)

The ground truth of DME was obtained from eye clinic, to assess the detection of DME markers by the DAPHNE detector.