Table 2B.
DAPHNE's Performance on External Validations: Sensitivity, Specificity and Corresponding 95% CIs for Referral Level Output to Detect Referral, PDR and DME, and PDR Level Output to Detect PDR on the Saudi Arabian Dataset
| Disease Level | Daphne Predicted Results | Sensitivity | Specificity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Referral vs. Non- Referral | Referral | 97.1% (95.1%–97.25%) | 90.33% (85.71%–92.17%) |
| PDR | 100% (94.5%–100%) | — | |
| DME | 100% (94.5%–100%) | — | |
| PDR vs. Non-PDR | PDR | 98.23% (93.3%–99.6%) | 83.78% (82.12%–88.87%) |
The ground truth of DME was obtained from eye clinic, to assess the detection of DME markers by the DAPHNE detector.