Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 14;2020:2164685. doi: 10.1155/2020/2164685

Table 3.

The performance of serology kits for HIV screening§.

Blood screening laboratories HIV serology kits Sensitivity n = 136 (%), 95% CI Specificity n = 893 (%), 95% CI Concordance rate||n = 1029 (%), 95% CI PPV, 95% CI NPV, 95% CI Kappa (κ)
BJ Wantai 134 (98.5%), 96.5%–100.5% 859 (96.2%)∗∗††, 95.0%–97.4% 993 (96.5%)∗∗††, 95.4%–97.6% 79.8%∗∗††, 73.7%–85.8% 99.8%, 99.4%–100.1% 0.861
HN Wantai 131 (96.3%), 93.1%–99.5% 839 (94.0%)∗∗††, 92.5%–95.5% 970 (94.3%)∗∗††, 92.9%–95.7% 70.8%∗∗††, 64.3%–77.3% 99.4%, 98.9%–99.9% 0.783
Wantai§ 134 (98.5%), 96.5%–100.5% 861(96.4%)∗∗††, 95.2%–97.6% 995 (96.7%)∗∗††, 95.6%–97.8% 80.7%∗∗††, 74.8%–86.7% 99.8%, 99.4%–100.1% 0.868
YN KHB 134 (98.5%), 96.5%–100.5% 872 (97.6%), 96.6%–98.6% 1006 (97.8%)††, 96.9%–98.7% 86.5%, 81.1%–91.8% 99.8%, 99.5%–100.1% 0.908
JN KHB 131 (96.3%), 93.1%–99.5% 868 (97.2%)∗∗††, 96.1%–98.3% 999 (97.1%)∗∗††, 96.1%–98.1% 84.0%∗∗††, 78.2%–89.7% 99.4%, 98.9%–99.9% 0.880
LN KHB 129 (94.9%)∗∗††, 91.2%–98.6% 843 (94.4%)∗∗††, 92.9%–95.9% 972 (94.5%)∗∗††, 95.4%–97.6% 72.1%∗∗††, 65.5%–78.6% 99.2%∗∗††, 98.6%–99.8% 0.787
KHB§ 134 (98.5%), 96.5%–100.5% 873 (97.8%), 96.8%–98.8% 1007 (97.9%), 97.0%–98.8% 87.0%, 81.7%–92.3% 99.8%, 99.5%–100.1% 0.912
SD InTec 133 (97.8%), 95.3%–100.3% 879 (98.4%), 97.6%–99.2% 1012 (98.3%), 97.5%–99.1% 90.5%, 85.8%–95.2% 99.7%, 99.3%–100.0% 0.930
JS InTec 133 (97.8%), 95.3%–100.3% 880 (98.5%), 97.7%–99.3% 1013 (98.4%), 97.6%–99.2% 91.1%, 86.5%–95.7% 99.7%, 99.3%–100.0% 0.934
HLJ InTec 133 (97.8%), 95.3%–100.3% 875 (98.0%), 97.1%–98.9% 1008 (98.0%), 97.1%–98.9% 88.1%, 82.9%–93.2% 99.7%, 99.3%–100.0% 0.915
LN InTec 132 (97.1%), 94.3%–99.9% 872 (97.6%), 96.6%–98.6% 1004 (97.6%)∗∗††, 96.7%–98.5% 86.3%, 80.8%–91.7% 99.5%, 99.1%–100.0% 0.899
CQ InTec 133 (97.8%), 95.3%–100.3% 876 (98.1%), 97.2%–99.0% 1009 (98.1%), 97.3%–98.9% 88.7%, 83.6%–93.7% 99.7%, 99.3%–100.0% 0.919
InTec§ 133 (97.8%), 95.3%–100.3% 881 (98.7%), 98.0%–99.4% 1014 (98.5%), 97.8%–99.2% 91.7%, 87.3%–96.2% 99.7%, 99.3%–100.0% 0.938
HZ Livzon 133 (97.8%), 95.3%–100.3% 875 (98.0%), 97.1%–98.9% 1008 (98.0%), 97.1%–98.9% 88.1%, 82.9%–93.2% 99.7%, 99.3%–100.0% 0.915
ZH Livzon 133 (97.8%), 95.3%–100.3% 873 (97.8%), 96.8%–98.8% 1006 (97.8%)††, 96.9%–98.7% 86.9%, 81.6%–92.2% 99.7%, 99.3%–100.0% 0.907
Livzon§ 133 (97.8%), 95.3%–100.3% 876 (98.1%), 97.2%–99.0% 1009 (98.1%), 97.3%–98.9% 88.7%, 83.6%–93.7% 99.7%, 99.3%–100.0% 0.919
SD Bio-Rad (4th) 136 (100%), 100.0%–100.0% 795 (89.0%)∗∗††, 87.0%–91.0% 931 (90.5%)∗∗††, 88.7%–92.3% 58.1%∗∗††, 51.8%–64.4% 100%, 100.0%–100.0% 0.682
SZ Bio-Rad (4th) 136 (100%), 100.0%–100.0% 795 (89.0%)∗∗††, 87.0%–91.0% 931 (90.5%)∗∗††, 88.7%–92.3% 58.1%∗∗††, 51.8%–64.4% 100%, 100.0%–100.0% 0.682
BJ Bio-Rad (4th) 136 (100%), 100.0%–100.0% 798 (89.4%)∗∗††, 87.4%–91.4% 934 (90.8%)∗∗††, 89.0%–92.6% 58.9%∗∗††, 52.6%–65.2% 100%, 100.0%–100.0% 0.689
HLJ Bio-Rad (4th) 136 (100%), 100.0%–100.0% 797 (89.2%)∗∗††, 87.2%–91.2% 933 (90.7%)∗∗††, 88.9%–92.5% 58.6%∗∗††, 52.3%–64.9% 100%, 100.0%–100.0% 0.687
Bio-Rad (4th)§ 136 (100%), 100.0%–100.0% 812 (90.9%)∗∗††, 89.0%–92.8% 948 (92.1%)∗∗††, 90.5%–93.7% 62.7%∗∗††, 56.3%–69.1% 100%, 100.0%–100.0% 0.726
JL Wantai (4th) 135 (99.3%), 97.9.0%–100.7% 843 (94.4%)∗∗††, 92.9%–95.9% 978 (95.0%)∗∗††, 93.7%–96.3% 73.0%∗∗††, 66.6%–79.3% 99.9%, 99.7%–100.1% 0.813
JS Wantai (4th) 135 (99.3%), 97.9.0%–100.7% 863 (96.6%)∗∗††, 95.4%–97.8% 998 (97.0%)∗∗††, 96.0%–98.0% 81.8%∗∗††, 76.0%–87.7% 99.9%, 99.7%–100.1% 0.88
TJ Wantai (4th) 133 (97.8%), 95.3%–100.3% 853 (95.5%)∗∗††, 94.1%–96.9% 986 (95.8%)∗∗††, 94.6%–97.0% 76.9%∗∗††, 70.6%–83.1% 99.6%, 99.3%–100.0% 0.837
HB Wantai (4th) 134 (98.5%), 96.5%–100.5% 854 (95.6%)∗∗††, 94.3%–96.9% 988 (96.0%)∗∗††, 94.8%–97.2% 77.5%∗∗††, 71.3%–83.7% 99.8%, 99.4%–100.1% 0.844
Wantai (4th)§ 135 (99.3%), 97.9.0%–100.7% 863 (96.6%)∗∗††, 95.4%–97.8% 998 (97.0%)∗∗††, 96.0%–98.0% 81.8%∗∗††, 76.0%–87.7% 99.9%, 99.7%–100.1% 0.880
TZ Murex (4th) 135 (99.3%), 97.9.0%–100.7% 833 (93.3%)∗∗††, 91.7%–94.9% 968 (94.1%)∗∗††, 92.7%–95.5% 69.2%∗∗††, 62.8%–75.7% 99.9%, 99.6%–100.1% 0.782
CZ Murex (4th) 135 (99.3%), 97.9.0%–100.7% 834 (93.4%)∗∗††, 91.8%–95.0% 969 (94.2%)∗∗††, 92.8%–95.6% 69.6%∗∗††, 63.1%–76.0% 99.9%, 99.6%–100.1% 0.785
HB Murex (4th) 135 (99.3%), 97.9.0%–100.7% 849 (95.1%)∗∗††, 93.7%–96.5% 984 (95.6%)∗∗††, 94.4%–96.8% 75.4%∗∗††, 69.1%–81.7% 99.9%, 99.7%–100.1% 0.832
Murex (4th)§ 135 (99.3%), 97.9.0%–100.7% 842 (94.3%)∗∗††, 92.8%–95.8% 977 (94.9%)∗∗††, 93.6%–96.2% 72.6%∗∗††, 66.2%–79.0% 99.9%, 99.7%–100.1% 0.809
ZH Livzon (4th) 135 (99.3%), 97.9.0%–100.7% 869 (97.3%)∗∗††, 96.2%–98.4% 1004 (97.6%)∗∗††, 96.7%–98.5% 84.90%††, 79.4%–90.4% 99.90%, 99.7%–100.1% 0.901
NCCL ECLIA 136 (100%), 100.0%–100.0% 884 (99.0%), 98.4%–99.6% 1020 (99.1%), 98.5%–99.7% 93.8%, 89.9%–97.7% 100%, 100.0%–100.0% 0.963
NCCL CLIA 136 (100%), 100.0%–100.0% 885 (99.1%), 98.5%–99.7% 1021 (99.2%), 98.7%–99.7% 94.4%, 90.7%–98.2% 100%, 100.0%–100.0% 0.967

§The final result of each ELISA among 1029 blood donations was determined by more than half results of different blood centers using the same ELISA and S/CO if the number of reactive and nonreactive results was equal. ||The proportion of true results among samples screened by HIV serology kits. P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, P < 0.05, ††P < 0.01, ELISA, and ECLIA: the values () were compared with ECLIA (Roche Elecsys HIV combi PT); ELISA and CLIA: the values () were compared with CLIA (Abbott ARCHITECT HIV Ag/Ab Combo).