Table 3.

Inferential statistics for supplemental analyses comparing outcomes between POP (N = 84) and two historical comparison conditions (TSP-Mixed, N = 75; Referral, N = 60).

	3 mo				6 mo
	POP vs. TSP-Mixed		POP vs. Referral		POP vs. TSP-Mixed		POP vs. Referral
	AOR (95% CI) / Cohen’s d	p	AOR (95% CI)	p	AOR (95% CI)	p	AOR (95% CI)	p
Smoking outcomes
Verified abstinence	.90 (.23, 3.49)	.88	3.02 (.34, 26.68)	.32	1.38 (.43, 4.41)	.59	1.07 (.33, 3.47)	.91
Self-reported abstinence	2.22 (.84, 5.86)	.11	6.82 (1.47, 31.63)	.01	2.26 (.99, 5.15)	.05	2.75 (1.11, 6.84)	.03
Reduction by 50%+	1.23 (.59, 2.56)	.58	2.72 (1.23, 6.00)	.01	1.06 (.51, 2.21)	.88	1.53 (.72, 3.24)	.27
Preparation or action stage	1.14 (.55, 2.36)	.72	1.22 (.57, 2.65)	.61	1.53 (.71, 3.27)	.28	.95 (.44, 2.06)	.90
Quit attempt during treatment	1.24 (.51, 3.03)	.63	1.60 (.66, 3.92)	.30	—	—	—	—
Acceptability and engagement
Easy to understand	3.04 (.26, 35.07)	.37	32.85 (3.92, 275.55)	.001	—	—	—	—
Gave sound advice	.84 (.22, 3.25)	.80	5.08 (1.71, 15.08)	.003	—	—	—	—
Helped me be healthier	1.00 (.47, 2.14)	.998	2.40 (1.10, 5.25)	.03	—	—	—	—
Something new to think about	1.27 (.41, 3.99)	.68	7.68 (2.81, 20.98)	<.001	—	—	—	—
I used the information	.66 (.27, 1.62)	.36	3.62 (1.59, 8.22)	.002	—	—	—	—
Recommend the program to others	.82 (.28, 2.41)	.72	3.52 (1.39, 8.92)	.008	—	—	—	—
I thought about what I read	.86 (.22, 3.30)	.83	7.50 (2.57, 21.85)	<.001	—	—	—	—
Comment volume: M (SD)	d = .39	.06	—	—	—	—	—	—

Note: Analyses were conducted on complete cases, with the exception of biochemically verified abstinence (assumes missing = smoking). Boldface indicates the statistical significance of the pairwise comparison with the POP group (p < .05).