Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 12;22(9):1460–1467. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntz115

Table 4.

Adjusted Models Between Quit Success and Spontaneous Quit attempts and Potential Confounder

Adjusted
OR (95% CI) p BF(HN)
Model 1
 Spontaneous quit attempt (not spontaneousa) 1.18 (0.96 to 1.46) .113 0.94c
 Quit attempt made without cutting down first (with cutting down firsta) 3.15 (2.54 to 3.91) <.001 >10 000d
Model 2
 Spontaneous quit attempt (not spontaneousa) 1.28 (1.04 to 1.57) .017 3.86d
 Strength of urges
  Nonea (n = 154)
  Slight (n = 272) 1.32 (0.87 to 2.02) .199 1.18c
  Moderate (n = 944) 0.75 (0.52 to 1.09) .127 1.46c
  Strong (n = 468) 0.55 (0.37 to 0.84) .005 24.33d
  Very strong (n = 135) 0.62 (0.36 to 1.05) .079 2.73c
  Extremely strong (n = 45) 0.66 (0.29 to 1.41) .302 1.24c
Model 3
 Spontaneous quit attempt (not spontaneousa) 1.25 (1.02 to 1.54) .029 2.16c
 Daily cigarette consumption 0.80 (0.71 to 0.89) <.001 136.82d
Model 4
 Spontaneous quit attempt (not spontaneousa) 1.36 (1.11 to 1.67) .003 31.70d
 Social grade
  ABa (n = 260)
  C1 (n = 465) 1.10 (0.79 to 1.54) .561 0.40c
  C2 (n = 438) 0.81 (0.57 to 1.14) .216 0.83c
  D (n = 349) 0.71 (0.49 to 1.02) .064 2.25c
  E (n = 506) 0.48 (0.33 to 0.68) <.001 1114.57d

BF = Bayes factor; CI = confidence interval; OR = odds ratio.

aReference level.

bEvidence for the null hypothesis.

cData are insensitive to detect an effect.

dEvidence for the alternative hypothesis.