Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep;46(9):1580–1587. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.05.016

Table 2.

Likert scale description used for reference during the panel assessment.

Excellent 5 Good 4 Moderate 3 Poor 2 Very Poor 1
Shape The overall shape of the reconstructed breast/s Shape symmetry out of bra achieved Shape of operated breast is pleasing but not symmetrical Moderate difference in shape but does not detract from overall aesthetic result Moderate focal deficits detracting from overall aesthetic result Large focal deficits distorting contour significantly detracts from overall aesthetic result
Volume Overall volume symmetry between breasts Equal volume between breasts Minor difference in volume Moderate difference in volume but does not detract from overall aesthetic result Volume difference impacts overall aesthetic result Major volume mismatch significantly detracts from overall aesthetic result
Nipple Position Nipple position in relation to the ipsilateral breast Excellent symmetry between sides and nipple in an ideal position on reconstructed breast mound Minor adjustments required to achieve excellence in nipple position Noticeably suboptimal but does not influence overall aesthetic results Nipple position slightly impacts overall aesthetic result Nipple position significantly detracts from overall aesthetic result
Projection Patient view of symmetry Projection is equal Minor differences in projection Noticeable difference but not detracting from overall aesthetic result Slightly impacts overall aesthetic result Significantly detracts from overall aesthetic result
Position of Breast Mound In relation to chest wall and other breast Equal to the other side and in an optimal position on chest wall Minor asymmetry of position or symmetrical but suboptimal position Asymmetry of position or symmetrical but suboptimal position not detracting from overall aesthetic result Slightly impacts overall aesthetic result Significantly detracts from overall aesthetic result
Symmetry Comparison between breasts Out of bra symmetry achieved Mild asymmetry Moderate asymmetry but does not detract from overall aesthetic result Moderate asymmetry detracting from overall aesthetic result Significant asymmetry detracting from overall aesthetic result
Global Taking into consideration subscale evaluation what is your overall impression of the quality of the reconstruction Excellent Good Moderate Poor Very Poor