Table 4.
Unadjusted OR (95% CI) | Adjusted OR (95% CI) | |
---|---|---|
Interaction effect of immigrant status and UD at baseline | ||
Immigrant with UD v. immigrant without UD | 7.41 (5.73–9.57) | 5.37 (4.04–7.14) |
Immigrant with UD v. non-immigrant with UD | 1.08 (0.86–1.37) | 1.10 (0.84–1.45) |
Immigrant without UD v. non-immigrant without UD | 1.11 (0.94–1.31) | 1.15 (0.95–1.39) |
Non-immigrant with UD v. non-immigrant without UD | 7.56 (6.64–9.62) | 5.59 (4.79–6.52) |
Interaction effect of sex and UD at baselineb | ||
Female with UD v. female without UD | 6.71 (5.75–7.81) | 5.10 (4.29–6.06) |
Female with UD v. male with UD | 0.95 (0.78–1.15) | 1.06 (0.84–1.33) |
Female without UD v. male without UD | 1.21 (1.06–1.37) | 1.25 (1.09–1.44) |
Male with UD v. male without UD | 8.47 (7.14–10.20) | 6.02 (4.90–7.41) |
OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; UD, undiagnosed depression; DS, depressive symptoms.
The multivariate logistic regression model adjusted for all the variables included in Table 1. The full model is in online Supplementary Table D.
The model did not show a three-way interaction of immigrant status, sex and UD at baseline.