Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 14;29:e158. doi: 10.1017/S2045796020000670

Table 4.

Associations of immigrant status with and without undiagnosed depression at baseline with depressive symptoms at 18 months (N = 23 002)a

Unadjusted OR (95% CI) Adjusted OR (95% CI)
Interaction effect of immigrant status and UD at baseline
Immigrant with UD v. immigrant without UD 7.41 (5.73–9.57) 5.37 (4.04–7.14)
Immigrant with UD v. non-immigrant with UD 1.08 (0.86–1.37) 1.10 (0.84–1.45)
Immigrant without UD v. non-immigrant without UD 1.11 (0.94–1.31) 1.15 (0.95–1.39)
Non-immigrant with UD v. non-immigrant without UD 7.56 (6.64–9.62) 5.59 (4.79–6.52)
Interaction effect of sex and UD at baselineb
Female with UD v. female without UD 6.71 (5.75–7.81) 5.10 (4.29–6.06)
Female with UD v. male with UD 0.95 (0.78–1.15) 1.06 (0.84–1.33)
Female without UD v. male without UD 1.21 (1.06–1.37) 1.25 (1.09–1.44)
Male with UD v. male without UD 8.47 (7.14–10.20) 6.02 (4.90–7.41)

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; UD, undiagnosed depression; DS, depressive symptoms.

a

The multivariate logistic regression model adjusted for all the variables included in Table 1. The full model is in online Supplementary Table D.

b

The model did not show a three-way interaction of immigrant status, sex and UD at baseline.