Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 16;12(8):220–230. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v12.i8.220

Table 1.

Comparison of patient characteristics between the esophagogastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy groups

EGDS group (n = 17) CS group (n = 27) P value
Age (yr, mean ± SD) 75.2 ± 13.0 75.7 ± 13.0 0.88
Sex, male/female 15/2 22/5 0.69
Period after B-II reconstruction (yr, mean ± SD) 36.8 ± 13.8 36.8 ± 13.8 1.0
Diseases treated with B-II reconstruction
Gastric ulcer, n 10 11
Duodenal ulcer, n 3 9
Gastric cancer, n 2 4
Pyloric stenosis, n 1 1
Gastric ptosis, n 1 1
Unknown, n 1
Untreated papilla of Vater, n (%) 15 (88.2) 27 (100) 0.14
Antithrombotic drugs, n (%) 2 (11.8) 5 (18.5) 0.69
Periampullary diverticulum, n (%) 1 (5.9) 3 (11.1) 1.0
Disease, n
Bile duct stone 11 20 0.52
Others 6 7
Biliary ductal cancer 3 2
Pancreatic cancer 1 3
Chronic pancreatitis 1 1
Benign biliary stricture 1 1
Transverse diameter of the largest stone (mm, mean ± SD) 10.2 ± 4.8 12.2 ± 3.8 0.24
Number of stones [n, median (range)] 4 (1 - 30) 2 (1 - 6) 0.18

EGDS: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy; CS: Colonoscopy; B-II: Billroth II.