Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 21;13:1756284820948773. doi: 10.1177/1756284820948773

Table 2.

Results of most relevant clinical trials on immune checkpoint inhibitors for gastrointestinal cancers.

Tumor type Treatment Phase ClinicalTrials.gov identifier Patient feature Clinical outcome Reference
Esophageal cancer Pembrolizumab versus Paclitaxel, Docetaxel, or Irinotecan III KEYNOTE-181
(NCT02564263)
628 patients with advanced EC that progressed after 1 line of therapy
222 patients with PD-L1 CPS ⩾10
401 patients with ESCC
[PD-L1 CPS ⩾10]
mOS: 9.3 versus 6.7 months
(HR = 0.69 [95% CI: 0.52–0.93]; p = 0.0074)
[ESCC]
mOS: 8.2 versus 7.1 m
(HR = 0.78 [95% CI: 0.63–0.96]; p = 0.0095)
Shah et al.36
Nivolumab versus
Paclitaxel or Docetaxel
III ATTRACTION-3
(NCT02569242)
Patients with EC who have been refractory or intolerant to one previous fluoropyrimidine-based and platinum-based chemotherapy
Nivolumab: 210 patients
Paclitaxel or Docetaxel: 209 patients
mOS: 10.9 versus 8.4 month
(HR = 0.77 [95% CI: 0.62–0.96; p = 0.019])
Kato et al.37
Gastric and Gastroesophageal junction cancer Nivolumab versus placebo III ATTRACTION-2
(NCT02267343)
493 patients with advanced GC/GEJc who had been treated with ⩾2 chemotherapy regimens ORR: 11.2% versus 0%
DCR: 40.3% versus 25%
mPFS: 1.61 versus 1.45 month
(HR = 0.60 [95% CI: 0.49–0.75]; p < 0.0001)
mOS: 5.26 versus 4.14 month
(HR = 0.63 [95% CI: 0.51–0.78]; p < 0.0001)
Kang et al.38
Nivolumab + SOX or Nivolumab + CapeOX II/III ATTRACTION-4
(NCT02746796)
<phase II>
Patients with previously untreated, unresectable, advanced, or recurrent HER2-negative GC/GEJc
Nivolumab + SOX (NS): 21 patients
Nivolumab + CapeOX (NC): 18 patients
ORR: 57.1% (NS)
76.5% (NC)
mPFS: 9.7 months (NS)
10.6 months (NC)
Boku et al.39
Pembrolizumab II KEYNOTE-059
(NCT02335411)
259 patients with advanced GC/GEJc with ⩾2 prior lines of treatment ORR: 11.6% (6 CRs)
DCR: 28%
mDOR: 8.4 months
mPFS: 2.0 months
mOS: 5.6 months
Fuchs et al.40
Pembrolizumab versus Paclitaxel III KEYNOTE-061
(NCT02370498)
592 patients (395 PD-L1 CPS ⩾1) with advanced GC/GEJc that progressed on first-line chemotherapy with a platinum and fluoropyrimidine
Pembrolizumab arm: 207 GC/89 GEJc
(196 PD-L1 CPS ⩾1)
Paclitaxel arm: 200 GC/96 GEJc
(199 PD-L1 CPS ⩾1)
Pembrolizumab versus Paclitaxel (PD-L1 CPS ⩾1)
ORR: 16% versus 14%
mDOR: 18.0 versus 5.2 month
mPFS: 1.5 versus 4.1 month
(HR = 1.27 [95% CI: 1.03–1.57])
mOS: 9.1 versus 8.3 month
(HR = 0.82 [95% CI: 0.66–1.03])
Shitara et al.41
Pembrolizumab or Pembrolizumab + chemotherapy or placebo + chemotherapy III KEYNOTE-062
(NCT02494583)
Randomized study of first-line pembrolizumab or pembrolizumab + chemotherapy versus placebo + chemotherapy in 763 patients with PD-L1 CPS ⩾1, HER2-negative, advanced GC/GEJc
(69% GC/30% GEJc)
(281 patients [37%] PD-L1 CPS ⩾10)
Pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy
mOS: 10.6 versus 11.1 month
(HR = 0.91 [95% CI: 0.69–1.18])
[PD-L1 CPS ⩾10
]mOS: 17.4 versus 10.8 month
(HR = 0.69 [95% CI: 0.49–0.97])
Tabernero et al.42
Colorectal cancer Pembrolizumab II KEYNOTE-164
(NCT02460198)
63 patients with MSI-H/dMMR mCRC with ⩾1 prior line of therapy ORR: 58%
(2 CRs and 18 PRs)
Le et al.43
Pembrolizumab III KEYNOTE-177 (NCT02563002) 307 patients with MSI-H/dMMR mCRC were randomly assigned 1:1 to first-line pembrolizumab or investigator’s choice of mFOLFOX6 or FOLFIRI ± bevacizumab or cetuximab (chemotherapy)
Pembrolizumab: 153 patients
Chemotherapy: 154 patients
Pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy
mPFS: 16.5 versus 8.2 month
(HR = 0.60 [95% CI: 0.45–0.80]; p = 0.0002)
12-month PFS: 55.3% versus 37.3%
24-month PFS: 48.3% versus 18.6%
ORR: 43.8% versus 33.1%
Thierry et al. 44
Nivolumab + low-dose Ipilimumab II CheckMate-142
(NCT02060188)
Preciously treated 119 patients with MSI-H/dMMR mCRC ORR: 58%
DCR: 81%
Overman et al.45
Atezolizumab + cobimetinib (MEK1/2 inhibitor) and atezolizumab monotherapy
versus regorafenib
III IMblaze370
(NCT02788279)
Previously treated 363 patients with unresectable mCRC were randomized to 2:1:1
Atezolizumab + cobimetinib (A+C): 183 patients
Atezolizumab monotherapy (A): 90 patients
Regorafenib (R): 90 patients
mOS:
8.9 months (A+C)
7.1 months (A)
8.5 months (R)
Bendell et al.46
Hepatocellular carcinoma Nivolumab I/II CheckMate-040
(NCT01658878)
262 patients with advanced HCC ORR: 18.2% Crocenzi et al.47
Nivolumab III CheckMate-459
(NCT02576509)
Nivolumab versus sorafenib as a first-line treatment in 1009 patients with unresectable HCC HR = 0.85 [95% CI: 0.72–1.02]; p = 0.0752 Press Release on June 2448
Pembrolizumab II KEYNOTE-224
(NCT02702414)
104 patients with HCC who had previously treated with sorafenib ORR: 17%
(1 CR and 17 PRs)
Zhu et al.49
Pembrolizumab III KEYNOTE-240
(NCT02702401)
Pembrolizumab versus BSC as a second-line therapy (413 patients)
(278 in pembrolizumab and 135 in placebo)
Pembrolizumab improved OS (HR = 0.78) and PFS (HR = 0.78)
(Not reached the prespecified statistical criteria)
ORR: 16.9% versus 2.2%
Finn et al.50
Pembrolizumab +Lenvatinib Ib KEYNOTE-524
(NCT03006926)
First-line treatment for advanced unresectable HCC ORR: 46% (95% CI: 36.0–56.3)
mOS: 22.0 months
mPFS: 9.3 months
(11 CRs and 35 PRs)
ASCO2020 Virtual Scientific Program51
Nivolumab + pilimumab I/II CheckMate-040
(NCT01658878)
148 patients with advanced HCC who were previously treated with sorafenib
(arm A) nivolumab/ipilimumab every 3 weeks
(arm B) nivolumab/ipilimumab every 2 weeks
(arm C) nivolumab/ipilimumab every 6 weeks
In arm A, the mOS was 23 months and 4 of the 50 patients had a CR Thomas et al.52
Atezolizumab +
Bevacizumab
III IMbrave150
(NCT03434379)
Randomized study of first-line atezolizumab + bevacizumab versus sorafenib in 501 patients with unresectable HCC
Atezolizumab + bevacizumab: 336 patients
Sorafenib: 165 patients
Atezolizumab + bevacizumab significantly improved OS (HR = 0.58) and PFS (HR = 0.59) compared with sorafenib Finn et al.53
Biliary tract cancers Pembrolizumab II KEYNOTE-158
(NCT02628067)
104 patients with advanced BTC and prior progression/intolerance on standard therapy ORR: 6.6% (PD-L1 positive)
2.9% (PD-L1 negative)
Ueno et al.33
Nivolumab monotherapy or in combination with cisplatin + gemcitabine I JapicCTI-153098 60 patients with unresectable or recurrent BTC
(30 in nivolumab monotherapy and 30 in nivolumab + cisplatin-gemcitabine)
Nivolumab monotherpy versus combination
mOS: 5.2 versus 15.4 months
mPFS: 1.4 versus 4.2 months
ORR: 1/30 versus 11/30
Ueno et al.54
Durvalumab with or without tremelimumab I NCT01938612 107 patients with advanced BTC
(42 in durvalumab monotherapy [D] and 65 in durvalumab + tremelimumab [D+T])
DCR at 12 weeks:
16.7% (D)
32.2% (D+T)
Ioka et al.55
Pancreatic cancer Ipilimumab II - 27 patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreas adenocarcinoma ORR: 0%
1 delayed response
Royal et al.56
Durvalumab with or without tremelimumab II NCT02558894 65 patients with advanced pancreatic cancer
(33 in durvalumab monotherapy [D] and 32 in durvalumab + tremelimumab [D+T])
ORR: 0% (D), 3.1% (D+T)
DCR: 6.1% (D), 9.4% (D+T)
O’Reilly et al. 57

BSC, best supportive care; BTC, biliary tract cancer; CapeOX, capecitabine plus oxaliplatin; CI, confidence interval; CPS, combined positive score; CR, complete response; DCR, disease control rate; dMMR, mismatch repair deficient; EC, esophageal cancer; ESCC, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; FOLFIRI, leucovorin plus 5-fluorouracil plus irinotecan; GC, gastric cancer; GEJc, gastroesophageal junction cancer; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; HR, hazard ratio; mCRC, metastatic colorectal cancer; mDOR, median duration of response; mFOLFOX6, modified oxaliplatin plus leucovorin plus 5-fluorouracil; mOS, median overall survival; mPFS, median progression-free survival; MSI-H, microsatellite instability-high; ORR, objective response rate; PD-L1, programmed cell death ligand 1; PR, partial response; SOX, S-1 plus oxaliplatin.