Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Aug 24.
Published in final edited form as: J Pediatr Nurs. 2019 Apr 23;47:36–43. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2019.03.018

Table I.

Studies included in the systematic review

References Study Design (SC or MC, RCT, blinded, other information) Treatment: Name of steroid, potency and vehicle (class) Placebo: Vehicle/moisturizer Frequency of application Duration of treatment (days) Number ITT, n per protocol In final analysis (n intervention, n control group), Age Range in months (mean), comments AD severity, % male, % Race/Ethnicity Potential Conflicts of Interest Number of Responders to therapy Intervention, Control; Primary outcomes assessed (1,2 or 3) & primary outcome reported in this column)$ Number of Participants >=1 AE Intervention, Control
(Udompatai kul and Limpa-o-vart 2012) SC Thailand, RCT, single blind participant, comparative effectiveness, placebo & steroid on different arms at same time Hydrocortisone 1% ointment (VII) 5% Dexapantheno l ointment BID 28 30, 26 (26,26) 2–180 (86) Mild/moderate, 38%, 100% Asian Bayer provided dexpanthenol ointment 26, 26 (1,2,3 & 1,2,3) 0, 0
(Sudilovsk y, Muir et al. 1981) MC USA, RCT, double blind, comparison study, placebo & steroid on different arms at same time Halcinonide 0.10% cream (II) Vehicle QD 21 58, 58 (58,58) 9–1032 (not reported) Not reported Funded by Squibb Institute 33, 10 (1 & 1) Not reported
Wu (Wu, Chen et al. 2013) SC China, RCT, double blind, parallel group comparison study Mometasone furoate 0.1% cream (II) Vehicle mixed with distilled water in 1% DMSO BID 10 40, 36 (19,17) 1–12 (4) All severities, 64%, 100% Asian. Funded by Medical Emphasis grant from government of Jiangsu Province, People’s republic of China. 19, 17 (1,2,3 & 1,2,3) 0, 0
(Wolkerstorfer, Visser et al. 2000) SC Netherlands, RCT, unspecified blinding Fluticasone propionate 0.05% cream diluted, open weave cotton wet wraps applied on top (V) Vehicle QD 7–14 8, 8 (6,2) 5–156 (not reported) Moderate/severe , 48%, Not reported Funding source not listed. 5, 0 (2 & 2) 2, 2
(Sugarman and Parish 2009) MC USA, RCT, triple blind Fluticasone propionate 0.05%, cream (III) Ceramide-dominant triple lipid barrier repair formulation (epiceram) BID 28 121, 112 (59,53) 6–216 (91) Moderate/severe , 40%, 26% White, 56% Black, 3% Asian, 9% Hispanic, 6% Other Funded by Ceragenix corporation. 27, 21 (3 & 3) 0, 4
(Abramovit s and Oquendo 2010) MC USA, RCT, double blind Hydrocortisone butyrate 0.1% lipocream (V) Lipocream vehicle BID 21–29 264, 247 (131,133) 3–204 (85) Mild/moderate, Not reported Sponsor initiated investigation 82, 37 (1 & 1) 29, 28
(Matheson, Kempers et al. 2008) MC USA, RCT, triple blind, parallel group Hydrocortisone butyrate 0.1%, lotion (V) Vehicle BID 28 284, 252 (139,145) 3–216 (86), 33% <2 years Mild/moderate, 50%, 65% White, 32% Black, 5% Asian, 1% Other* Funded by Ferndale Laboratories, authors compensated for the study. 68, 35 (1 & 1) 48, 56
(Hanifin, Gupta et al. 2002) MC USA & Canada, RCT, double bind, we analyzed data only from maintenance phase of study when placebo compared Fluticasone propionate 0.05%, cream (V) Vehicle QD (4 days/week for 4 weeks) then QD (2 days/week for 16 weeks) 140 247, 231 (154,77) 3–204 (85), 24% <2 years Moderate/severe#, 44%, 64% White, 16% Black, 14% Asian, 6% Other Funded by Glaxo Wellcome, Inc. 112, 26 (1 & 1) 71, 29
(Stalder, Fleury et al. 1994) SC France, RCT, double blind Desonide 0.1%, cream (III) Polyoxyethyle ne glycol mixed stearate with other additives QD 7 40, 39 (18,21) 4–180 (40) Not reported, 55%, Not reported Funding source not specified, but one of the authors works at Pierre Fabre laboratories. 12, 3 (3 & 3) Not reported
(Rauschkol b, Bender et al. 1981) MC USA, RCT, double blind, paired comparison, place & steroid on different arms at the same time Halcinonide 0.025% cream (IV) Placebo cream unspecified TID 14 86, 79 (79,79) 7–180 (96) Not reported, 38%, 70% White, 29% Black, 1% Asian Funded by Squibb and Sons, Inc. 64, 40 (1 & 1) 4, 5
(Hebert, Cook-Bolden et al. 2007) RCT USA, MC, double blind, phase III study Desonide 0.05%, gel (VI) Hydrogel vehicle BID 28 582, 541 (425,157) 3–216 (80), 30% <3years Mild/Moderate, 45%, 53% White, 28% Black, 4% Asian, 12% Hispanic, 3% Other. Funded by SkinMedica, Inc. 166, 17 (1,3 & 1,3) 85, 46
(Eichenfield and Miller 2006) RCT USA, MC, double blind, phase III study Fluticasone propionate 0.05% lotion (V) Lotion vehicle QD 28 438, not reported (221,217) 3–192 (not reported), 6% ≤1 year Moderate/Sever e, Not reported Funded by GlaxoSmithKline. 156, 64 (1,2 & 2) 77, 82

Application site reactions= dermatitis, pruritus, irritation, burning

*

Numbers reported in article add up to great than 100%

#

moderate/severe prior to starting the stabilization phase, likely mild by the time randomized

$

Primary Outcomes Assessed: 1. Study-designated “good response”; 2. The number of participants with at least a 50% reduction in AD severity; 3. Eczema rated as cleared or controlled. Most studies did not report all three of these potential outcomes.