Table 3.
AXIS risk of bias assessment summary – percentages of items satisfied.
| Author | Intro | Methods | Results | Conclusions | Other | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baas et al.51 | 100% | 60% | 75% | 50% | 50% | Moderate |
| Barra et al.52 | 100% | 90% | 80% | 100% | 100% | Low |
| Borde et al.61 | 100% | 80% | 90% | 50% | 0% | Moderate |
| Borde et al.60 | 100% | 70% | 100% | 50% | 100% | Moderate |
| Cocchini et al.53 | 0% | 20% | 50% | 50% | 0% | High |
| Coslett54 | 100% | 70% | 75% | 50% | 0% | Moderate |
| Di Vita et al.23 | 100% | 70% | 75% | 50% | 100% | Moderate |
| Heilman et al.55 | 100% | 40% | 25% | 50% | 50% | High |
| Meyer et al.62 | 100% | 80% | 75% | 100% | 100% | Moderate |
| Richard et al.56 | 100% | 80% | 50% | 50% | 50% | Moderate |
| Rousseaux et al.57 | 100% | 60% | 50% | 50% | 50% | High |
| Saj et al.58 | 100% | 60% | 50% | 50% | 100% | Moderate |
| Schmidt et al.63 | 100% | 50% | 50% | 100% | 100% | Moderate |
| Semrau et al.65 | 100% | 70% | 75% | 50% | 50% | Moderate |
| Semrau et al.64 | 100% | 70% | 75% | 100% | 50% | Moderate |
| Tosi et al.66 | 100% | 90% | 80% | 50% | 100% | Low |
| van Stralen et al.67 | 100% | 70% | 75% | 100 | 100% | Moderate |
| Vromen et al.59 | 100% | 80% | 75% | 100% | 100% | Moderate |