Table 5.

Comparison of proprioceptive impairments between UN+ and UN− (dichotomous outcomes).

Study	Proprioception outcome	N +		N-		Odds ratio (95% CI)	More impaired group
		%	N	%	N
Movement detection
Meyer et al.62	Em-NSA	48.1	27	15.8	95	4.95 (1.94–12.61)	UN+
	TFT (0–3)	77.8	27	47.4	95	3.89 (1.44–10.49)	UN+
van Stralen et al.67	RASP–Impaired	100	9	25.7	35	53 (2.81–1001.40)	UN+
Joint position matching
Semrau et al.65	Robotic Arm Position Matching Task–Failure	100	35	59	123	48.78 (2.92–813.68)	UN+
Semrau et al.64	Robotic Upper Limb Position Match–Impaired+/−vision	85	59	38	222	9.12 (4.27–19.51)	UN+
Laterality
van Stralen et al.67	Bergen Laterality Test Total Failure	25.7	9	11.1	35	2.21 (0.34–14.59)	Nil
Body topography
Cocchini et al.53	Body Exploration Fluff Test–Impaired	71.4	14	16.7	24	12.5 (2.57–60.70)	UN+

UN: unilateral neglect; UN+: participants with UN; UN−: participants without UN; CI: confidence interval; Em-NSA: Erasmus Modifications to the Nottingham Sensory Assessment; TFT: thumb finding test; RASP: Rivermead Assessment of Somatosensory Perception.