Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 19;14(4):1557988320939714. doi: 10.1177/1557988320939714

Table 4.

Summary of Semen Parameters in Men From the General Population Living in Northern or Eastern European Countries.

Reference Region Age, years Semen parameters, Mean (Median)
Semen volume, ml Sperm concentration, ×106/ml Sperm motility, % Morphologically normal sperm, %
Jørgensen et al., 2002 Finland (n = 324)
Estonia (n = 104)
Norway (n = 240)
Denmark (n = 300)
military conscripts
18
3.3 (3.0)
3.2 (3.1)
3.1 (2.9)
3.3 (3.0)
72 (61)
72 (62)
69 (53)
57 (44)
64 (66)a
73 (75)a
64 (66)a
65 (68)a
8.9 (9.0)c
9.2 (9.0)c
6.9 (7.0)c
6.4 (5.0)c
Punab et al., 2002 Lithuania (n = 196)
Estonia (n = 79)
18
19
2.8 (2.5)
3.3 (3.0)
75 (65)
81 (64)
76 (79)a
74 (76)a
6.2 (6.0)c
7.7 (7.0)c
Malm et al., 2004 Norway:
Oslo (n = 112)
Tromsoe (n = 92)
19–40 − (3.6)
– (3.7)
− (53)
– (62)
− (48)b
– (50)b
Paasch et al., 2008 Germany:
Hamburg (n = 334)
Leipzig (n = 457)
military conscripts
19.7
18.9
3.4 (3.2)
2.7 (2.6)
63 (49)
65 (45)
66 (68)a
77 (82)a
9.3 (8.5)c
8.3 (8.0)c
Axelsson et al., 2011 Sweden (Malmo area)
(n = 295)
17–20 2.9 (2.7) 71 (56) 53 (58)b
Jørgensen et al., 2012 Denmark
(Copenhagen area) (n = 4867)
18–19 3.4 (3.2) 60 (45) 65 (68)a
56 (59)b
7.1 (6.5)c
Halling et al., 2013 Faroe Islands (n = 481)
Denmark (n = 1274)
24
19
4.1 (3.9)
3.6 (3.3)
57 (40)
62 (48)
64 (64)a
65 (68)a
6.9 (6.5)c
7.5 (7.0)c
Kamieniczna et al., 2015 Poland:
Poznan (n = 113)
Lublin (n = 89)
18–35 3.5 (– )
3.1 (– )
49.6 (– )
40.9 (– )
42.3 (– )b
47.5 (– )b
Erenpreiss et al., 2017 Estonia:
Russians (n = 272)
Estonians (n = 301)
Latvia (n = 278)
Lithuania (n = 314)
16–29 − (3.0)
– (3.4)
– (3.2)
– (3.4)
− (68)
– (63)
– (55)
– (63)
− (57)b
– (59)b
– (61)b
– (60)b
− (11.5)c
– (12.0)c
– (11.5)c
– (12.0)c
Our study European North of Russia (n = 90) 21–63 3.3 (3.0) 55.8 (42.1) 45.0 (43.8) b 7.0 (6.5)

Note. aThe sum of progressively motile (classes A + B) and local motile (class C) sperm. bWHO progressive motility (classes A + B). cSemen morphology was defined according to “strict criteria” (Menkveld et al., 1990).