Skip to main content
[Preprint]. 2020 Aug 17:rs.3.rs-56281. [Version 1] doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-56281/v1

Table 3.

Complete modeling output for Cox regression, with inverse-probability treatment weighting, adjustments, stabilized weights and accounting for competing risks.

Variable SHR 95% CI P-value
Prone positioning intervention (yes vs no)
No Reference - -
Yes 0.61 0.46–0.80 < 0.001
Age
< 41 years Reference - -
41–60 years 2.68 0.83–8.59 0.10
61–80 years 4.45 1.39–14.20 0.01
> 80 years 7.11 2.13–23.76 0.001
Sex
Female Reference - -
Male 1.06 0.78–1.44 0.69
Race
White Reference - -
Hispanic 0.33 0.18–0.60 < 0.001
Black 0.38 0.20–0.73 0.003
Asian * * *
Other 0.34 0.12–0.96 0.04
Body mass index, No. (%)
< 18.5kg/m2 * * *
18.5–24.9 kg/m2 Reference - -
25–29.9 kg/m2 0.85 0.53–1.36 0.49
≥ 30 kg/m2 0.87 0.57–1.33 0.52
APACHE-II score 1.01 0.99–1.03 0.26
Vasopressor use
No Reference - -
Yes 1.18 0.76–1.85 0.46
*

Observations were dropped from model due to small N and no variability in treatment (e.g. all within category were treated or all within category were not treated)