Table 1.
References | Country | Therapy area | Biosimilars | Model | Projected saving | Additional patients treated |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aladul et al. [125] | UK |
Rheumatology Gastroenterology |
Adalimumab Etanercept Infliximab |
Budget impact model using retrospective market shares of biologics in rheumatology and gastroenterology | £44 million over next 3 years | |
Jha et al. [126] |
Belgium Germany Italy Netherlands UK |
Rheumatology Gastroenterology Dermatology |
Infliximab | Budget impact model with a 1-year time horizon | €25.79–77.37 million depending on country and price discount | 1960–7561 across all five countries |
Brodszky et al. [127] |
Bulgaria Czech Republic Hungary Poland Romania Slovakia |
Crohn’s disease | Infliximab | 3-year, prevalence-based budget impact analysis |
Scenario 1: interchanging not allowed: €8 million Scenario 2: interchanging allowed in 80% patients: ca. €17 million |
|
Lee et al. [128] | 28 EU countries* |
Breast cancer Gastric cancer |
Trastuzumab | Budget impact model with time horizon of 1–5 years |
€0.91–2.27 billion over 5 years depending on scenario In the first year only budget savings ranged from €58 million to €136 million |
3503–7078 |
Gulacsi et al. [129] | 28 EU countries* |
Rheumatology Cancer |
Rituximab | 3-year base-case scenario |
Base-case scenario (biosimilar uptake 30%, cost 70% of originator): €90 million Second scenario (biosimilar uptake 50%): €150 million |
Over 3 years projected budget savings were €570 million equating to 47,695 additional patients able to access rituximab |
*Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, UK