Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 24;21(12):871–887. doi: 10.2217/pgs-2020-0040

Table 2. . Characteristics of pharmacokinetics studies of methadone with genotyping available.

Study (year) n Male Female Methadone samples Genotype Analysis Ref.
Csajka (2016) 251 190 61 PK modeling 244 peak (C4) and/or trough (C0), seven rich samples (11 each) in steady state CYP2B6: *6 [*4 and *9], *5, *11, intronic (rs2279344), intronic (rs8192719)
CYP2C9 *2, *3
CYP2C19 *2, *3
CYP2D6 *3, *4, *5, *6
CYP3A4*1B, *22
CYP3A5*3
CYP3QA7*1C
ABCB1 61A>G, 1199G>A, 1236C>T, 2677G>T, 3435C>T
Population PK analysis with genotypes and supposed activity scores as covariates on clearance parameter [42]
Crettol (2005) 209 NA NA 192 patients with trough (C0) and/or peak (C4) samples in steady state; 17 with trough only CYP2B6 *4, *5, *6, *7, *9
CYP2C9 *2, *3
CYP2C19 *2, *3
Univariate analysis between genotype and concentrations [69]
Crettol (2006) 245 185 60 245 trough (C0) and 203 (C4) peak samples under steady state CYP1A2*1F
CYP2B6*4, *5, *9,
CYP2C9*2, *3
CYP2C19*2, *3,
CYP2D6*3, *4, *5, *6, xN
CYP3A4*1B, *3
ABCB1 61A>G, 2677G>T, 3435C>T UGT2B7*2a
Univariate analysis between genotype and concentrations [64]
Dennis (2014)
Meta-analysis
NA NA NA Data from four PK studies out of total seven studies selected for review. Crettol et al., Fonseca et al. and Uehlinger et al. CYP2B6*6
ABCB1 3435C>T
Univariate analysis between genotype and concentrations [64,65,69,72,85]
Kharasch (2015) 64 NA NA 489 genotyped out of which three groups of 20 subjects each were created with CYP2B6*1/*1, CYP2B6*1/*6 and CYP2B6*6/*6. Multiple PK samples through 96 h after single dose in healthy volunteers. CYP2B6 *4, *5, *6, *7, *9, *16 and *18 Univariate analysis between plasma EDDP/methadone, AUC ratio and genotype [66]
Bunten (2010) 67 NA NA Concentration measured during autopsy CYP2B6 *6 (*4 and *9) Univariate analysis between genotype and concentrations [68]
Kringen (2017) 64 NA NA At steady state (≥12 h after last intake of methadone) CYP2B6 *6 (*4 and *9)
CYP3A5 *3
CYP2C9 *2, *3
CYP2D6 *3, *4, *5, *6
CYP2C19 *2, *3
Linear mixed model analysis along with age, gender and time with repeated measurements of concentration [67]
Wang (2011) 366 297 69 Trough samples at steady state rs8100458, rs10500282, rs10403955, rs2279342, rs3745274 (*9), rs2279343 (*4)
rs2279345, rs1038376, rs707265, rs1042389
Univariate analysis between identified genotype and concentrations after multiple testing correction [70]
Fonseca (2017) 105 74 31 76 responders and 29 nonresponders. Trough samples at steady state CYP2B6 *1, *4, *6
CYP2C19 *1, *2, *3
CYP2D6 *1, *2, *3, *4, *5, *6, *9, *10, *17, *35, *41
CYP3A5 *1*3
CYP2C9 *1*2*3
ABCB1 3435C>T
Univariate analysis between genotype and concentrations after multiple testing correction [72]
Bart (2014) 206 NA NA PK modeling with 441 samples at steady state CYP3A4 *1b, rs28371759, rs4986909
CYP2B6*4, *5, *9, intronic (rs8192709)
CYP2D6 rs1065852, rs5030656 CYP2C19 rs3758581
ABCB1 61A>G, 1236C>T, 2677G>T, 3435C>T, rs6949448, rs2235067, rs1922242, rs1128503, rs2520464, rs3789243
CYP1A2 rs762551
Population PK analysis with genotypes as covariates on clearance parameter [71]
Ahmad (2017) 228 NA NA Concentration measured during autopsy compared with 297 controls CYP2B6 *5, *9, *2, *8, *15
intronic (rs2279344, rs4803419, rs8192719)
Univariate analysis between genotype and concentrations after multiple testing correction [73]
Dobrinas (2013) 276 NA NA Trough samples at steady state CYP2B6 sequencing of 3917 bp including all nine exons and exon–intron boundaries Univariate analysis between identified genotype and concentrations after multiple testing correction [74]
Yang (2016) 344 + 76 281 + 59 63 + 17 At steady state. Sampling schedule unknown. Genotyping in 344 patients to identify susceptibility loci.
Additional 76 patients used for validation.
Whole-genome pharmacogenomic study using Axiom Genome-Wide CHB 1 Array (Affymetrix, CA, usa) Genome-wide singe-locus association analysis after multiple test correction and sliding-window haplotype-based association analysis with concentration [75]
Wang (2013) 366 NA NA Samples at 24 ± 2 h after the last methadone dose at steady state CYP2C19 *2, *3 Univariate analysis between genotype and concentrations [76]
Carlquist (2015) 31 NA NA Day 1 and day 21 peak and trough concentrations CYP2B6 *9
CYP3A4 *1b, *22
CYP2C19 *2
ABCB1 3435C>T
NOS1AP (rs12143842)
Univariate analysis between genotype and concentrations [50]
Richards (2014) 228 NA NA Concentration measured during autopsy CYP3A4 *1B
rs4987161, rs4986910
intronic (rs2246709, rs3735451, rs4646437 and rs2242480)
Univariate analysis between genotype and concentrations [77]
Eap (2001) 256 202 54 Plasma trough at steady state. 15 patients with bd dosing were removed from analysis CYP2D6*3, *4, *5, *6, *xN Univariate analysis between genotype and concentrations after multiple testing correction [78]
Lee (2013) 178 156 22 Plasma trough at steady state CYP2B6 *4, *9, and *5, CYP2C19 *2, *3, *17 and ABCB1 1236C>T, 2677G>T/A and 3435C>T Univariate analysis between genotype and concentrations [79]
Barratt (2012) 119 NA NA Plasma trough at steady state ABCB1 61A>G, 1199G>A, 1236C>T and 3435C>T Univariate analysis between genotype and concentrations without multiple testing correction [27]
Zahari (2016) 148 148 NA Trough, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24 h after morning dose at steady state ABCB1 1236C>T, 2677G>T/A and 3435C>T Univariate analysis between genotype and concentrations without multiple testing correction [80]
Uehlinger (2007) 14 NA NA Trough samples at steady state before and after >1 week of quetiapine CYP2B6 *4, *5, *6, *7, *9
CYP3A5 *3
CYP2D6 *3, *4, *5, *6, *xN
ABCB1 3435C>T
Univariate analysis between before and after concentrations in each of the genotypes [85]

As mentioned in the published literature.

AUC: Area under the curve; bp: Base pair; EDDP: 2-ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine; NA: Not available; PK: Pharmacokinetic.