Table V.
Relationship between PLR, NLR, dNLR, LMR and OS in patients RCC who underwent nephrectomy – univariate and multivariate analysis
| Parameter | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis* | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR | 95% CI | P-value | HR | 95% CI | P-value | |
| PLR | 1.005 | 1.004–1.006 | < 0.0001 | 1.003 | 1.001–1.004 | 0.0002 |
| NLR | 1.185 | 1.14–1.232 | < 0.0001 | 1.087 | 1.031–1.147 | 0.002 |
| dNLR | 1.531 | 1.364–1.718 | < 0.0001 | 1.337 | 1.144–1.562 | 0.0003 |
| LMR | 0.676 | 0.610–0.748 | < 0.0001 | 0.915 | 0.823–1.017 | 0.1 |
Adjusted for: age (continuous), higher Fuhrman grade (G3-4 vs. G1-2), higher pT category (pT3-4 vs. pT1-2), lymph node involvement (presence vs. absence), distant metastasis (presence vs. absence) and tumor necrosis (presence vs. absence).
PLR – platelet-lymphocyte ratio, NLR – neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, dNLR – derived neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, LMR – lymphocyte-monocyte ratio, OS – overall survival, HR – hazard ratio, CI – confidence interval.