Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2019 Oct 9;20(1):e30–e37. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2019.09.622

Table 2.

Minimal residual disease negativity.

Study Regimen Sample Size MRD Availability MRD Negativitya MRD Negativityb Rate (95% CI)
IFM/DFCI 200949
RVD + ASCT
RVD
700
350
350
581 (at least VGPR)
308
273
423
246
177
0.60 (0.57, 0.64)
0.70 (0.65, 0.75)
0.51 (0.45, 0.56)
GEM2005MAS6534 — VMP
VTP
260
130 130
153 (at least PR)
79 74
34
19 15
0.13 (0.09, 0.18)
0.15 (0.09, 0.22)
0.12 (0.07, 0.18)
NCT0053145346 — VTDC
VTD
98
49
49
58 (suspected CR)
26
32
42
16
26
0.43 (0.33, 0.53)
0.33 (0.2, 0.48)
0.53 (0.38, 0.67)
ALCYONE47
Dara+VMP
VMP
706
350
356
236 (at CR or sCR)
149
87
100
78
22
0.14 (0.12, 0.17)
0.22 (0.18, 0.27)
0.06 (0.04, 0.09)
EMN02/HO9550, 51 — ASCT
VMP
1192
695
497
957 (at least VGPR)
584
373
814
449
274
0.68 (0.66, 0.71)
0.65 (0.61, 0.68)
0.55 (0.50, 0.59)
CLARION — KMP
VMP
327
166
161
223 (EOT)
113
110
65
33
32
0.20 (0.14, 0.27)
0.20 (0.14, 0.27)
0.20 (0.14, 0.27)

ASCT, autologous stem cell transplant; CI, confidence interval; CR, complete response; Dara, daratumumab; EOT, end of treatment; KMP, carfilzomib, melphalan, and prednisone; MRD, minimal residual disease; PFS, progression-free survival; PR, partial response; RVD, lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone; VGPR, very good partial response; VMP, bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone; sCR, stringent complete response; VTD, bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone; VTDC, bortezomib, thalidomide, dexamethasone, and cyclophosphamide; VTP, bortezomib, thalidomide, and prednisone

a

MRD negativity was calculated based on the sample size assuming those patients without an MRD status were MRD positive.

b

MRD-negativity rate is presented as the number of MRD-negative patients divided by the total number of patients in the trial arm (sample size).