Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Aug 24.
Published in final edited form as: Am Econ J Econ Policy. 2019 Feb;11(1):192–221. doi: 10.1257/pol.20150421

Table 2—

Distribution of Physicians by Vignette Responses

Panel A. PCPs (N = 570 in restricted sample)
Cowboy Comforter
Follow-up frequency No Yes No Yes
 Low 41 9 34 16 8.8%
 Medium 387 108 270 225 88%
 High 12 13 15 10 4.4%
77% 23% 56% 44%
p(χ2): <0.001 p(χ2): 0.055
Comforter
Cowboy No Yes
 No 236 204 77%
 Yes 83 47 23%
56% 44%
p(χ2): 0.013
Panel B. Cardiologists (N = 415 in restricted sample)
Cowboy Comforter
Follow-up frequency No Yes No Yes
Low 6 0 5 1 1.4%
Medium 240 80 228 92 77%
High 61 28 69 20 21%
74% 26% 73% 27%
p(χ2): <0.001 p(χ2): <0.001
Comforter
Cowboy No Yes
 No 227 80 74%
 Yes 75 33 26%
73% 27%
p(χ2): <0.001

Notes: This table shows the bivariate relationships between the guideline-defined indicators for recommended follow-up frequency, as well as “Cowboy” and “Comforter” status among both PCPs and cardiologists in the (restricted) analysis sample. χ2-tests evaluate the null hypothesis that there is no association between pairs of indicators in the table.