Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Aug 24.
Published in final edited form as: Proc (IEEE Int Conf Healthc Inform). 2019 Nov 21;2019:10.1109/ichi.2019.8904739. doi: 10.1109/ichi.2019.8904739

TABLE VII.

Performance comparison of different methods for each maximum KDIGO based AKI severity classification. Alignment: Z - zero-padding, D - DTW. Distance function: B - Bray-Curtis, E - Euclidean, C - Cityblock. TAKI is the proposed method.

MinMortDiff MaxMortDiff RelMortdiff MinProgDiff MaxProgDiff RelProgDiff

Method K1 K2 K3/3D K1 K2 K3/3D K1 K2 K3/3D K1 K2 K3/3D K1 K2 K3/3D K1 K2 K3/3D

ZB 0.47 0.71 1.71 13.94 30.86 29.36 0.14 0.31 0.30 1.41 0.00 7.03 9.78 18.55 18.79 0.10 0.19 0.20
ZE 0.09 0.36 0.35 6.81 9.23 29.28 0.07 0.09 0.29 0.08 0.78 1.60 11.96 7.26 20.47 0.12 0.07 0.21
ZC 1.14 0.55 0.14 7.45 27.91 39.71 0.08 0.28 0.40 0.97 0.01 0.00 14.98 7.85 16.88 0.15 0.08 0.17
DB 0.04 1.03 4.35 15.13 45.81 53.67 0.15 0.46 0.56 1.75 0.10 0.00 31.77 23.88 25.00 0.32 0.24 0.25
DE 0.06 1.12 2.52 14.31 34.69 47.63 0.14 0.35 0.49 0.42 0.13 0.00 35.08 29.92 28.38 0.35 0.30 0.28
DC 0.23 0.61 0.69 13.71 34.23 47.03 0.14 0.34 0.47 0.07 0.55 0.00 34.51 24.30 26.25 0.35 0.24 0.26
TAKI 0.43 1.17 7.42 14.07 54.78 69.50 0.14 0.55 0.75 1.43 0.70 0.00 17.98 43.10 35.71 0.18 0.43 0.36