Table 3.
System GMM estimates for Rural Broadband Availability.
| 25/3 - Rural (1) |
Fiber - Rural (2) |
2+ Competitors - Rural (3) |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coeff. | S.E. | Coeff. | S.E. | Coeff. | S.E. | |
| Lag (availability) - Rural | 0.448 | 0.015*** | 0.818 | 0.025*** | 0.803 | 0.019*** |
| % Bachelor's Degree or More – Rural | 0.264 | 0.029*** | 0.095 | 0. 022*** | 0.104 | 0.018*** |
| % Poverty – Rural | −0.401 | 0.046*** | −0.091 | 0.028*** | −0.112 | 0.192*** |
| % Housing after 2010 - Rural | −0.152 | 0.096 | 0.382 | 0.065*** | 0.059 | 0.075 |
| ln (Median Household Income – Rural) | −0.035 | 0.004*** | −0.009 | 0.330*** | −0.016 | 0.002*** |
| ln (Rural Population) | 0.045 | 0.003*** | −0.010 | 0.168*** | 0.015 | 0.001*** |
| Rural % of Population | 0.019 | 0.014 | 0.050 | 0.009*** | −0.008 | 0.006 |
| Topography | −0.001 | 0.001 | −0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Year F.E. | Yes | *** | Yes | Yes | ||
| Policy Variables | ||||||
| State funds | 0.018 | 0.007*** | 0.021 | 0.005*** | 0.014 | 0.004*** |
| State office | −0.007 | 0.008 | 0.015 | 0.006** | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Municipal restrictions | −0.037 | 0.011*** | −0.016 | 0.006** | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Constant | 0.175 | 0.042*** | 0.208 | 0.032*** | 0.037 | 0.024 |
| Wald Chi Squared | 15,432*** | 7,215*** | 17,635*** | |||
| # Instruments | 54 | 53 | 52 | |||
| # Groups | 3,028 | 3,028 | 3,028 | |||
| Hansen J-test | 0.251 | 0.304 | 0.275 | |||
| AR(1) | 0.000*** | 0.000*** | 0.000*** | |||
| AR(2) | 0.201 | 0.621 | 0.042** | |||
| # Observations | 18,159 | 18,159 | 18,159 | |||
*, **, and *** represent statistical significance at the p < .10, .05, and 0.01 levels, respectively.
Hansen J-test represents p-values for the null hypothesis of valid instruments (overidentification).
AR(1) and AR(2) represent p-values for null hypotheses of no 1st and 2nd-order autocorrelation.