Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 17;132(15):452–463. doi: 10.1007/s00508-020-01713-x

Table 3.

Results of the additional articles published since January 2017, details of previous studies published in Hasenoehrl et al. [5] and Keilani et al. [6]

Additional article Expansion Key findings/comments

Taaffe et al. [53]

Additional article of Newton et al. [49]

Additional results

↓ Fatigue (EORTC QLQ-C30 fatigue subscale, IRE at 26 and 52 weeks, RAE at 52 weeks, DAE at 52 weeks)

↑ Vitality (SF-36, IRE, RAE and DAE at 52 weeks)

↑ Cardiorespiratory fitness (400mWT, IRE and RAE at 52 weeks, no change in DAE)

↑ Muscle strength (sum of chest press and leg press, IRE at 26 < 52 weeks, RAE at 26 and 52 weeks, DAE at 52 weeks)

No group × time interaction

Wall et al. [52]

Additional article of Newton et al. [49]

Additional results

RAE vs. DAE in the first 26 weeks

↑ Cardiorespiratory capacity (VO2max, RAE)

↑ Fat oxidation (RAE)

↔ RMR

↔ BP

↔ Arterial stiffness

↔ Metabolic profile

↔ PSA and testosterone

↑ Lean tissue mass (RAE)

↓ Fat mass (RAE)

Between-group comparison

Fairman et al. [55]

Additional article of Galvao et al. [51]

Additional results

Training dose, adherence and tolerance

Actual training volume = 77.4% of prescribed

Training interrupted (≥3 consecutive sessions missed) in half of patients

Training missed (≤2 consecutive sessions missed) in approximately 90% of patients.

Training dose modified in approximately 85% of patients

Edmunds et al. [56]

Additional article of Galvao et al. [21]

Cost-effectiveness analysis 26 weeks of supervised exercise for prostate cancer survivors probably not cost-effective

Newton et al. [54]

Additional article of Taaffe et al. [50]

Additional results

↑ Muscle strength

– In IEI at 26 weeks

– In DEI at 52 weeks

– No difference at 52 weeks

↑ Physical function

– 6mWT (only in IEI at 26 weeks)

– 400mWT (IEI at 26 weeks, DEI at 52 weeks)

– Stair climbing (IEI at 26 weeks, DEI at 52 weeks)

– Repeated chair rise (IEI at 26 weeks, DEI at 52 weeks)

– Significant difference only for 6mWT at 52 weeks

Between-group comparison

IRE impact training and resistance exercise group, RAE resistance and aerobic exercise group, DAE delayed aerobic exercise group, VO2max maximal oxygen uptake, RMR resting metabolic rate, BP blood pressure, PSA prostate-specific antigen, IEI immediate exercise intervention group, DEI delayed exercise intervention group, 6mWT 6m walk test, 400mWT 400m walk test, ↑ significant increase or improvement, ↓ significant decrease, ↔ no change, EORTC QLQ-C30 European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire