Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 8;21(4):373–391. doi: 10.1007/s10162-020-00753-4

Table 2.

Summary of analyses of covariance for all significant main effects of group reported in the manuscript

Variable F value P value Effect size
YNH vs. ONH
  CO 8.752 0.006 0.240
  STR 6.146 0.02 0.185
  P1 AMP 2.870 0.10 0.098
  P1b AMP 16.346 < 0.001 0.384
  P2 LAT 39.345 < 0.001 0.611
  P1b LAT 111.367 < 0.001 0.817
ONH vs. OHI
  N1 AMP 6.762 0.016 0.200
  P1 LAT 3.533 0.072 0.128

The YNH vs. ONH comparison covaried for high-frequency pure-tone average and the ONH vs. OHI comparison covaried for age

CO 50 % crossover point, STR stimulus-to-response correlation, P1 AMP P1 amplitude, P1b AMP P1b amplitude, P2 LAT P2 latency, P1b LAT P1b latency, N1 AMP N1 amplitude, P1 LAT P1 latency