Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 24;10:14135. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-71145-0

Table 6.

Factors associated with failure in sleep improvement: subgroup analysis within the whole conservative cohort.

Whole conservative group
Increase in PSQI ≥ 3 Increase in PSQI < 3 p-value
Number of patients 67 80
Age 70.2 ± 10.1 69.0 ± 10.8 0.948
Sex (male:female) 28:39 (1:1.4) 33:47 (1:1.4) 0.947
BMI (kg/m2) 24.0 ± 3.1 24.8 ± 3.1 0.123
Charlson comorbidity index score 1.6 ± 1.4 1.2 ± 1.3 0.095
Hamilton depression rating scale 11.0 ± 7.6 14.2 ± 9.2 0.022
Oswestry disability index score 36.4 ± 17.8 40.2 ± 17.5 0.197
Visual analogue scale pain
Back pain 4.8 ± 1.4 4.9 ± 1.3 0.903
Leg pain 4.9 ± 1.6 5.3 ± 1.6 0.105
Dural sac cross-sectional area (mm2) at the most severe level 53 ± 30 60 ± 36 0.179
Morphologic grade of stenosis at the most severe level
Central-type stenosis by Schizas et al
A or B 16 (24) 21 (26) 0.779
C 29 (43) 37 (46)
D 22 (33) 22 (28)
Foraminal-type stenosis by Lee et al
Grade 0 or 1 12 (18) 16 (20) 0.026
Grade 2 35 (52) 25 (31)
Grade 3 20 (30) 39 (49)

Data were presented by number (%) of patients or mean ± standard deviation.