Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 24;10:14144. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-71123-6

Table 4.

Fisher’s z-scores (obtained from the transformation of the Pearson’s r values presented in Table 3) for the trained rater (rater 1), the novice rater (rater 2), and for the trained rater after MRI assessment.

Fisher’s z-scores
Rater 1, rater 2, rater 1 assessment n2 (post MRI assessment)
Muscle (distal—0%, to proximal—100%) Rater 1 (trained) Rater 2 (novice) Rater 1 assessment n2
Semimembranosus
30% (n = 85) 1.47 0.97 1.83
40% (n = 85) 1.25 1.22 1.73
50% (n = 85) 1.12 0.84 1.29
60% (n = 70)a 0.44 0.23 0.43
Mean ± SD 1.07 ± 0.44 0.81 ± 0.41 1.32 ± 0.63
Semitendinosus
30% (n = 85) 1.22 1.18 1.52
40% (n = 85) 1.22 1.33 1.47
50% (n = 85) 1.58 1.37 1.83
60% (n = 85) 1.47 1.02 1.66
Mean ± SD 1.37 ± 0.18 1.22 ± 0.16 1.62 ± 0.16
Biceps femoris long head
30% (n = 85) 1.42 1.12 1.37
40% (n = 85) 1.42 1.33 1.59
50% (n = 85) 1.37 1.22 1.65
60% (n = 84)a 0.99 0.88 1.15
Mean ± SD 1.30 ± 0.20 1.14 ± 0.19 1.44 ± 0.22
Biceps femoris short head
30% (n = 85) 1.07 1.04 1.52
40% (n = 85) 0.95 0.75 1.04
50% (n = 82)a 0.54 0.01 1.15
Mean ± SD 0.85 ± 0.27 0.60 ± 0.53 1.24 ± 0.25

All muscles

Mean ± SD

1.17 ± 0.33*** 0.97 ± 0.39 1.42 ± 0.36***,###

*** p < 0.001 vs. rater 2, ###p < 0.001 for rater 1 n2 (post-MRI) vs. rater 1.

aLower number of subjects due to not visible muscle.