Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 23;27(3):e100161. doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2020-100161

Table 2.

Comparison of characteristics for hypertensive patients with and without linked data

Linked
(n=6307)
Not linked
(n=246)
P value
Female, n (%) 3395 (53.8) 127 (51.6) 0.539
Age, mean (SD) 64.7 (14.1) 65.2 (17.2) 0.523
Deceased year recorded in the EMR, n (%) 30 (0.5) 60 (24.4) <0.001
Patient EMR status <0.001
 Active, n (%) 5326 (84.4) 126 (51.2)
 Deceased, n (%) 104 (1.6) 60 (24.4)
 Inactive, n (%) 99 (1.6) 8 (3.3)
 Unknown, n (%) 778 (12.3) 52 (21.1)
Urban residence, n (%)* 4312 (69.5) 156 (65.5) 0.225
Type of EMR <0.001
 Wolf, n (%) 3266 (51.8) 221 (89.8)
 Med Access, n (%) 3041 (48.2) 25 (10.2)
Number of primary care encounters, mean (SD) 45.8 (40.7) 39.2 (47.2) 0.013

*Postal code for determining urban or rural residence was missing for 99 patients (1.6%) in the Linked cohort and eight patients (3.3%) in the Not Linked cohort.

EMR, electronic medical record.;