Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 23;5(4):e000823. doi: 10.1136/esmoopen-2020-000823

Table 2.

Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis for DFS prediction in patients with NSCLC

All NSCLC group DFS
Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
HR (95% CI)  P value Relative risk (95% CI)  P value
Age (years): ≥65 vs <65 1.417 (0.91 to 2.2) 0.122
Gender: male versus female 1.322 (0.83 to 2.1) 0.244
Smoking history: smoker versus non-smoker 1.323 (0.85 to 2.1) 0.221
Histology: LUAD versus LUSC 1.218 (0.78 to 1.9) 0.389
Stage: III vs I 1.756 (1.4 to 2.2) <0.0001 1.65 (1.29 to 2.12) <0.0001
PD-L1: PD-L1+ versus PD-L 1.366 (0.82 to 2.3) 0.228
CD47: CD47pos versus CD47neg 1.734 (1.1 to 2.7) 0.017 1.63 (1.04 to 2.58) 0.035
M2 location: T&NT versus NT 2.036 (1.3 to 3.2) 0.002 1.41 (0.86 to 2.31) 0.17
Ratio of tumour M2/M1: high versus low 1.888 (1.1 to 3.2) 0.021 1.23 (0.69 to 2.21) 0.48
EGFR: mutation versus wild type 1.486 (0.91 to 2.4) 0.110
TP53: mutation versus wild type 0.9975 (0.63 to 1.6) 0.992
KRAS: mutation versus wild type 1.665 (0.85 to 3.2) 0.134
ERBB2: mutation versus wild type 0.7146 (0.31 to 1.6) 0.430

CD47neg, CD47 negative; CD47pos, CD47 positive; DFS, disease-free survival; LUAD, lung adenocarcinoma; LUSC, lung squamous cell carcinoma; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; NT, non-tumour area; T&NT, tumour area and non-tumour area.