Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 25;196:109503. doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2020.109503

Table 1.

An example with three employees.

Level of total reduction
10% ($45,000) 20% ($90,000) 30% ($135,000)
α=0 t1 0 0 0
t2 0 0 0.1167
t3 0.18 0.36 0.47
1Np 0.0661 0.1488 0.2530
α=0.25 t1 0 0 0
t2 0 0.0690 0.2024
t3 0.18 0.3186 0.4186
1Np 0.1985 0.1517 0.2561
α=0.5 t1 0 0 0
t2 0.0126 0.1329 0.2543
t3 0.1725 0.2802 0.3874
1Np 0.0673 0.1572 0.2612
α=0.75 t1 0 0.0757 0.1912
t2 0.0648 0.1708 0.2744
t3 0.1411 0.2424 0.3371
1Np 0.0730 0.1812 0.3147
α=0.9 t1 0.0523 0.1576 0.2629
t2 0.0867 0.1881 0.2896
t3 0.1175 0.2156 0.3136
1Np 0.0898 0.2076 0.3411
α=0.99 t1 0.0956 0.1961 0.2966
t2 0.0987 0.1988 0.2990
t3 0.1017 0.2015 0.3013
1Np 0.1039 0.2217 0.3552

Notes: This table reports the optimal reduction rates (as a percentage of wages) and average “pain” experienced by a firm with three employees. For this example, w1=$50,000, w2=$150,000, and w3=$250,000, and p(w,r)=ln(w)ln(wr).