Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 24;78(1):1–13. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.2950

Table 2. Primary and Secondary Efficacy End Points for Full Analysis Set.

End point No. (%)
Fingolimod groups GA, 20 mg, group
0.5 mg 0.25 mg
Total participants, No. 345 366 324
Primary
Aggregate ARR up to month 12 (confirmed relapses only)
ARR estimate (95% CI) 0.15 (0.11 to 0.21) 0.22 (0.17 to 0.29) 0.26 (0.20 to 0.34)
ARR ratio vs GA 20 mg 0.59 0.85 NA
Relative reduction vs GA 20 mg, % 40.7 14.6 NA
P value .01a .42 NA
Secondary
New or newly enlarging T2 lesions at month 12 or end of treatment
Participants evaluated, No. 303 331 272
Mean (SD) 2.6 (5.4) 3.3 (6.9) 5.7 (10.7)
P value <.001a <.001a NA
Participants without new or newly enlarging T2 lesions 156 (51.5) 155 (46.8) 96 (35.3)
P value vs GA <.001a <.001a NA
Gadolinium-enhancing T1 lesions at month 12 or end of treatment
Participants evaluated, No. 302 325 263
Mean (SD) 0.4 (1.6) 0.4 (1.6) 0.9 (3.7)
P value .02a .001a NA
Participants without gadolinium-enhancing T1 lesions 261 (86.4) 269 (82.8) 202 (76.8)
P value vs GA .004a .06 NA
Change from baseline in T2 lesion volume at month 12 or end of treatment
Participants evaluated, No. 304 332 272
Mean (SD), mL –0.14 (1.58) –0.05 (2.34) 0.42 (2.31)
P value vs GA <.001a .006a NA
Change from baseline in T1 hypointense lesion volume at month 12 or end of treatment
Participants evaluated, No. 302 331 271
Mean (SD), mL 0.33 (1.08) 0.37 (1.01) 0.25 (1.04)
P value vs GA .25 .03a NA
Gadolinium-enhancing T1 lesion volume at month 12 or end of treatment
Participants evaluated, No. 302 325 263
Mean (SD), mL 0.06 (0.22) 0.05 (0.18) 0.12 (0.45)
P value vs GA .005a .06 NA
% Change in brain volume from baseline to month 12 or end of treatment
Participants evaluated, No. 284 305 252
Mean (SD) –0.65 (0.78) –0.64 (0.81) –0.56 (0.78)
P value vs GA .10 .14 NA
Annualized rate of brain atrophy up to month 12 or end of treatment
Participants evaluated, No. 345 366 324
Mean (95% CI) –0.68 (–0.80 to –0.56) –0.69 (–0.81 to –0.58) –0.68 (–0.81 to –0.56)
P value vs GA .99 .90 NA
Change from baseline in TSQM scoresb
Global satisfaction
Participants evaluated, No. 185 201 180
Mean (SD) 19.2 (31.9) 20.5 (32.2) 9.4 (30.4)
P value vs baseline <.001a <.001a <.001a
Effectiveness
Participants evaluated, No. 187 198 178
Mean (SD) 16.8 (26.9) 17.9 (28.3) 8.0 (27.4)
P value vs baseline <.001a <.001a <.001a
Adverse effects
Participants evaluated, No. 185 194 174
Mean (SD) 16.2 (31.5) 17.2 (32.5) 7.6 (32.8)
P value vs baseline <.001a <.001a .005a
Convenience
Participants evaluated, No. 187 198 178
Mean (SD) 29.5 (24.4) 26.5 (26.4) 0.8 (25.7)
P value vs baseline <.001a <.001a .46
Change from baseline in PASAT-3 score
Participants evaluated, No. 291 317 276
Mean (SD) 2.4 (9.5) 1.7 (10.0) 1.1 (8.0)
P value vs GA 20 mg .01a .26 NA
Change from baseline in symbol Digit Modalities Test score
Participants evaluated, No. 301 319 278
Mean (SD) 6.2 (12.6) 6.6 (12.3) 5.1 (13.5)
P value vs GA 20 mg .29 .19 NA
Change from baseline in PRIMUS–Activities score
Participants evaluated, No. 261 281 230
Mean (SD) –0.12 (4.21) 0.17 (4.89) 0.55 (4.13)
P value vs GA 20 mg .008a .53 NA
Change from baseline in MSIS-29 score
Physical impact score
Participants evaluated, No. 315 336 291
Mean (SD) –3.5 (16.2) –1.5 (15.3) –0.8 (17.1)
P value vs GA 20 mg .007a .15 NA
Psychological impact score
Participants evaluated, No. 312 336 290
Mean (SD) –6.6 (19.9) –3.3 (19.8) –2.2 (21.4)
P value vs GA 20 mg .001a .12 NA

Abbreviations: ARR, annualized relapse rate; GA, glatiramer acetate; MSIS-29, 29-item Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale; PASAT-3, Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test 3; PRIMUS–Activities, Patient-Reported Indices in Multiple Sclerosis–Activities scale; TSQM, Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication.

a

Indicates an unpaired 2-sided statistical significance threshold of P = .05.

b

Only participants who were receiving disease-modifying therapy for multiple sclerosis at the screening visit completed the TSQM.