Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 2;2(2):120–142. doi: 10.3390/clockssleep2020011

Table A2.

(a) Patients who had a wear time 80% (n = 63). (b) Differences between patients with 80% wear time and <80% wear time. Simple t-test and chi2 tests were performed to determine a p value.

(a)
Average Time Worn (%) Number of Patients % of Patients
80 2 2.2
80.4 1 1.1
81.6 1 1.1
82 2 2.2
83.5 1 1.1
84.3 1 1.1
84.3 1 1.1
84.5 1 1.1
84.7 1 1.1
85.4 1 1.1
85.5 1 1.1
86 1 1.1
86.5 1 1.1
86.6 1 1.1
87 1 1.1
87.4 1 1.1
88.3 1 1.1
88.7 1 1.1
88.8 1 1.1
89 1 1.1
89.5 1 1.1
90 1 1.1
91.3 1 1.1
91.4 1 1.1
91.6 1 1.1
91.9 1 1.1
92 4 4.4
93.2 1 1.1
94.6 1 1.09
94.8 1 1.09
96.3 1 1.09
96.5 1 1.09
96.8 1 1.09
97.4 1 1.09
97.7 1 1.09
97.9 1 1.09
98 1 1.09
98.6 1 1.09
98.8 1 1.09
98.95 1 1.09
100 18 19.6
Total 63
(b)
Wear Time (%)
<80% (n = 29) 80% (n = 63) p
Age 71±12.1 66.5±13.3 0.1246
Female 11/29 = 15/63 = 0.162
ESS baseline 6.7±4.2 6.1±4.7 0.5964
EQ5D baseline 58.8±26.5 58.9±28.4 0.9789
PSQI baseline 5.2±3.1 7.1±4.2 0.0371
STOP BANG baseline 4.1±1.4 4.1±1.5 0.9415
Body Mass Index 28.1±5.6 30.1±5.4 0.1138
Neck circumference 39.4±2.5 39.2±4.1 0.8496
Length of stay 3.2±2.7 3.0±1.5 0.6345