Table 2.
Diagnostic work flow prior to surgery
Ref. | CT | MRI | ERCP | Ultrasound | Others |
Ammori et al[27] | Yes | Yes | 100% | Yes | No data |
De Kerckhove et al[19] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Percutaneous cholangiography |
Kassahun et al[21] | 100% | 16.2% | 83.9% | 100% | No data |
Habib et al[17] | No data | No data | No data | No data | No data |
Bockhorn et al[30] | 100% | No data | 92% | 100% | No data |
Millwala et al[5] | No data | No data | No data | No data | No data |
Ulrich et al[3] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Percutaneous cholangiography |
Hori et al[24] | No data | No data | No data | No data | No data |
Lendoire et al[13] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Percutaneous cholangiography |
Mabrut et al[20] | No data | 74.7% | 27.7% | No data | No data |
Moslim et al[12] | No data | No data | No data | No data | No data |
Fahrner et al[25] | No data | No data | No data | No data | No data |
Percentages given indicate frequency of diagnostic tool within the study. CT: Computed tomography; MRI: Magnetic resonance imaging; ERCP: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.