Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 2;93:20200301. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20200301

Table 1.

Characteristics of included studies

StudY Year No.of cases Age(mean range) Initial Tumor Size Histologic
SubtYpe
Equipment (MRI,C-ESM)and Magnet Strength (T) Duration of the patients (year. month) pCR rate
(%)
Definition of pCR Contrast
Material (MRI,CESM,d-ose)
CE-MRIor
CESM used
The research type
De Los Santos14 2013 746 49 (20–86) T1—4 IDC,ILC GE,3/1.5T 2002.01–2011.02 23.99 No residual NR CE-MRI retrospective
Chen16 2008 51 49.5 (31–77) T2—4 NR Philips,1.5T NR 54.9 No invasive 0.1 cc/kg CE-MRI retrospective
Nicoletto17 2008 26 47 (30–57) T2—4 IDC,ILC NR 2001.03–2003.06 23.08 No residual NR CE-MRI prospective
Choi, J.H18 2010 29 45.1 (24–63) T2—4 IDC,ILC NR 2004.12–2008.03 24.17 No residual NR CE-MRI prospective
Dose—Schwarz19 2010 46 50 (30–66) T2—4 NR NR NR 10.87 No residual NR CE-MRI prospective
Fangberget20 2011 22 50.7 (37–72) T2—4 IDC,ILC Siemens,1.5T 2007.04–2008.10 36.36 No invasive 0.1 mmol/kg CE-MRI prospective
Park21 2011 32 45 (28–67) NR IDC Siemens,1.5T 2006.08–2008.05 25.00 No invasive 0.1 mmol/kg CE-MRI retrospective
Hayashi, Y22 2013 264 51 (23–71) T1—4 IDC Philips,1.5T 2003.02–2008.06 37.12 No invasive NR CE-MRI prospective
Ko, E.S23 2013 166 44 (23–72) T2—4 IDC,ILC Philips,3T 2007.04–2010.12 24.09 No invasive 0.1 mmol/kg CE-MRI retrospective
Williams24 2013 87 50 (25–83) T2—4 IDC,ILC  Fairfield,1.5T 2004.01–2009.11 25.29 No residual 0.1 mmol/kg CE-MRI retrospective
Choi, BB25 2015 98 50 (29–81) NR IDC,ILC Philips,3/1.5T 2006–2011 17.35 No invasive 0.2 mmol/kg CE-MRI prospective
Diguisto26 2015 102 48.5 NR IDC,ILC Siemens,1.5T 2008.01–2011.12 29.41 No residual NR CE-MRI prospective
Lee, M.C27 2015 39 46.9 (24–64) T1—4 NR NR 2008–2012 28.21 No invasive NR CE-MRI prospective
Vriens28 2016 149 NR NR NR >1.5T 2006.02–2009.04 16.78 No invasive NR CE-MRI prospective
Fukuda29 2016 265 49.9 (25–78) T2—4 NR GE,1.5T 2005.01–2007.12 7.17 No invasive 0.2 mmol/kg CE-MRI  retrospective
Weber,JJ31 2017 129 50.8(27–80) T1—4 NR Milwaukee,3/1.5T 2014.06–2015.08 31 No residual 0.1 mmol/kg CE-MRI  prospective
ElSaid32 2017 21 50 (30–77) T3—4 IDC,ILC,other GE Healthcare NR 28.5 No residual 1.5 ml/kg CESM prospective
Moustafa33 2019 42 NR NR IDC,ILC,other GE Seno graphe NR 92.85 No residual NR CESM prospective
Iotti34 2017 46 54 (33–72) T2—4 IDC,ILC,other GE,1.5T,GE Healthcare 2012.10–2014.12 17 No residual NR CE-MRI/CESM prospective
Patel37 2018 65 52.7 (30–76) T1—4 IDC,ILC,other GE,3.0T,GE Healthcare NR 30.76 No residual NR,1.5 ml/kg CE-MRI/CESM prospective
Barra35 2018 33 45(22-76) NR IDC,ILC,other GE,1.5T,GE Healthcare 2015.08–2017.12 24.2 No residual 0.1 mmol/kg,NR CE-MRI/CESM prospective
Barraa36 2017 8 46.41(22-76) NR NR GE Healthcare 2011–2013 75 No residual  1–2 mL/kg CESM retrospective
Trecate15 1999 30 NR T4/LABC NR Siemens,1.5T 1995.11–1998.04 13.33 No residual 0.1 mmol/kg CE-MRI prospective
BhattacharYYa30 2008 32 42.7 (24–60) T2—3 NR GE,1.5T NR 15.63 No invasive 16 mmol/kg CE-MRI prospective

NR, not reported; pCR, pathological complete response.

Quality assessment

a

a study of the same author but different publication year;