Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 25;21:172. doi: 10.1186/s12881-020-01101-2

Table 1.

Association analysis of urolithiasis risk and SPP1 genetic variants considering their allelic and genotypic frequencies

SPP1 genetic variants Genotype/Allele Urolithiasis patients
n = 235, n (%)
Healthy controls
n = 243, n (%)
OR (95% CI) p-value (corrected)†
rs2853744:G > T T/T 07 (3.1%) 21 (9.1%) Referent 0.024
G/T 61 (27.2%) 62 (26.8%) 2.95 (1.17–7.45)
G/G 156 (69.6%) 148 (64.1%) 3.16 (1.31–7.66)
T 75 (17%) 104 (23%) Referent 0.035
G 373 (83%) 358 (77%) 1.44 (1.03–2.01)
rs11730582:T > C T/T 63 (28%) 69 (29.6%) Referent 0.017
T/C 87 (38.7%) 113 (48.5%) 0.84 (0.54–1.31)
C/C 75 (33.3%) 51 (21.9%) 1.61 (0.98–2.64)
T 213 (47%) 251 (54%) Referent 0.056
C 237 (53%) 215 (46%) 1.29 (1.00–1.68)
rs11439060:delG > G G/G 19 (8.3%) 12 (5%) Referent 0.002
G/dG 65 (28.5%) 103 (43.3%) 0.40 (0.18–0.88)
dG/dG 144 (63.2%) 123 (51.7%) 0.74 (0.35–1.58)
G 103 (23%) 127 (27%) Referent 0.170
dG 353 (77%) 349 (73%) 1.24 (0.92–1.68)

p-values are corrected for age and gender. p-value adjustment for multiple testing using Bonferroni method was also made (p-value threshold 0.016). Statistical significance is highlighted in bold

OR Odds ratio; n (%), frequency and CI Confidence interval