TABLE 2.
Themes, Their Descriptions, and Their Subthemes on How Families of Children With Medical Complexity Identify and Communicate About Clinical Deterioration in Hospital
| Theme | Description of Theme | Subthemes |
|---|---|---|
| “He writes his own book”: textbooks are of little help | Families have expert knowledge about their child’s unique responses to their chronic condition and care. | The child’s baseline is often misunderstood. |
| The family compares illness to previous illnesses and baseline, which team usually does not know. | ||
| Parent intuition is difficult to convey. | ||
| Informal, learned pathways to navigate a complex and confusing system and communicate with clinicians | Families develop knowledge, skills, tools, and resources over time with which to convey their expert knowledge with clinicians. | Understanding how to listen to and negotiate with trainees |
| Tools and strategies for families and clinicians to see the same thing at the same time with the right clinician | ||
| Importance of an explicit, clear, and shared plan of care | ||
| Nurse as trusted ally and advocate | ||
| Value of shared experience with clinicians in child’s illness and in building trust and respect | ||
| Families create organizational tools that are little informed by or informative to hospital-based tools. | ||
| Importance of advocacy and persistence | Families learn to advocate for the care they believe their child needs. | Clinical team recognizes and respects the family as an expert with their child. |
| Family has confidence in role as advocate and ability to advocate, which can take time to develop. | ||
| Families learn workarounds to escalate concerns as advocates in the hospital. | ||
| Coordination takes work and advocacy by family; care conferences are helpful but need to be requested. | ||
| “We’re not your typical parents”: parents and doctors learn roles as part of hospital care team | The family strives to be part of the care team, but the clinical team is often uncertain of and/or uncomfortable with how this process should work. | Lack of role clarity, and occasionally tension, for family versus care team tasks |
| Expertise of family and care team can seem competing and/or adversarial. | ||
| Family is part of the monitoring system in the hospital, including of objective data. | ||
| Family is the central story-keeper and storyteller; it takes effort to tell right parts of the story to right parts of the team. | ||
| Medical team continuity (across days and weeks) poses challenges to goals, trust, and understanding. | ||
| Medical culture and practice do not consistently support partnership | There is a perception that advocacy or conflict with clinical team could result in being labeled “difficult parents” and that their input is not always sought or valued, and this affects bidirectional communication. | “They wrote it in my chart by now.” |
| Doctors often lack emotional intelligence and/or listening skills. | ||
| Hospital processes do little to integrate home care routines and/or medication schedules. | ||
| Repetition of questions and care tasks in hospital can be frustrating. | ||
| Game of telephone: information gets lost, and loops do not get closed | ||
| Running on empty; stress, fear, lack of sleep, and loss of control in the hospital | Intrinsic stressors of hospitalization affect family experience and/or coping. | It is difficult to think and make decisions when low on sleep, food, and/or basic needs. |
| The hospital is a lonely, scary, stressful, and disorienting place. | ||
| Hospitalization means some loss of control and/or increased vulnerability to others’ whims and schedules. |