Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 25;82:38–47. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2020.08.019

Table 3.

Hazard ratios for mortality according to hydroxychloroquine use in different subgroups.

Hydroxychloroquine NO (N=817) Hydroxychloroquine YES (N=2,634)
Subgroups No. death/patient at risk No. death/patient at risk HR (95% CI)*
Women 80/361 116/940 0.63 (0.46 to 0.86)
Men 110/456 270/1,694 0.74 (0.60 to 0.93)
Age <70 years 22/357 93/1,542 0.76 (0.50 to 1.16)
Age ≥70 years 168/460 293/1,092 0.68 (0.56 to 0.83)
Highest degree of COVID-19 severity experienced at hospital
Mild pneumonia or less 28/424 40/1,358 0.70 (0.41 to 1.18)
Severe pneumonia 80/253 172/764 0.76 (0.58 to 0.99)
Acute respiratory distress syndrome 82/140 174/512 0.68 (0.52 to 0.90)
Use of other COVID-19 treatments^
No 101/439 64/570 0.63 (0.45 to 0.88)
Yes 89/378 322/2,064 0.77 (0.61 to 0.99)
C-Reactive Protein at basal**
<10 mg/L 56/412 125/1,138 1.23 (0.86 to 1.77)
≥10 mg/L 123/361 241/1,362 0.59 (0.47 to 0.73)

Abbreviations: HR, hazard ratios; CI, confidence intervals; *Propensity score analysis, inverse probability weighting, including hospital clustering as random effect covariate; multiple imputed analysis.

^Lopinavir/ritonavir or darunavir/cobicistat or tocilizumab or sarilumab or remdesivir or corticosteroids.

**Missing data for N=178. Frequencies and hazard ratios are based on a case complete analysis (N=3,273) without missing data for C-reactive Protein; multiple imputed analysis (N=3,451) yielded very similar results.