Table 2.
Baseline characteristics of two cohorts of patients diagnosed with acute myocardial infarction or heart failure, respectively, enrolled in the EFFECT study, and lived in an urban area across Ontario, Canada (percent or ).
Baseline characteristics | AMI cohort | HF cohort |
---|---|---|
() | () | |
Demographic characteristics | ||
Age at entry [y ()] | ||
Male | 65 | 50 |
Marital status | ||
Married | 63 | 46 |
Single, separated, divorced, or widowed | 33 | 49 |
Unknown | 4 | 5 |
Employment status | ||
Employed | 27 | 6 |
Not employed | 66 | 90 |
Unknown | 7 | 4 |
Clinical severity | ||
Acute pulmonary edema | 5 | 20 |
Patients with acute myocardial infarction | ||
GRACE risk score | —a | |
ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) | 43 | — |
Patients with heart failure | ||
EFFECT-heart failure mortality risk score | — | |
Ischemic etiology | — | 60 |
In-hospital care | ||
Length of stay (d) | ||
Specialty of attending physician | ||
Cardiology | 49 | 27 |
Internal medicine | 28 | 32 |
General practice | 23 | 41 |
Characteristics of hospitals | ||
Teaching | 23 | 24 |
Community | 76 | 75 |
Small | 1 | 1 |
Cardiovascular medication at dischargeb | ||
Statins | 54 | 16 |
Aspirin | 86 | 40 |
ACE inhibitor | 62 | 64 |
Beta-blockers | 74 | 28 |
Cardiac risk factors and history | ||
Current smoker | 32 | 12 |
Family history of coronary artery disease | 33 | —b |
Preexisting comorbiditiesc | ||
Diabetes | 25 | 36 |
Hypertension | 52 | 59 |
Hyperlipidemia | 39 | 30 |
Atrial fibrillation | — | 33 |
Acute myocardial infarction | 23 | 38 |
Stroke | 8 | 17 |
Previous percutaneous coronary intervention | 4 | 5 |
Asthma | 4 | 7 |
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease | 23 | 42 |
Dementia | 4 | 8 |
Cancer | 12 | 18 |
Area-level risk factorsd | ||
Income quintile | ||
Lowest | 20 | 24 |
Lower middle | 22 | 22 |
Middle | 21 | 20 |
Middle upper | 19 | 17 |
Highest | 18 | 16 |
% of recent immigrants | 4 | 4 |
% population age y with less than high school education | 32 | 29 |
% population age y without employment | 8 | 7 |
Note: EFFECT cohorts comprised all patients who were discharged alive with AMI or HF from one of 86 hospitals across Ontario in two periods, 1999–2000 and 2004–2005, respectively. In the present study, we restricted EFFECT cohorts to urban residents ages 35–100 y. AMI, acute myocardial infarction; EFFECT, Enhanced Feedback For Effective Cardiac Treatment study; GRACE, Global Registry of Acute Coronary Syndromes; HF, heart failure; SD, standard deviation.
Not applicable unless specified otherwise. For HF cohort, information for the family history of coronary artery disease was unavailable.
For HF cohort, only data from the first phase of EFFECT study (1999–2000) were collected.
During the past 10 y before cohort inception.
From the 2001 Canadian Census, at the census dissemination area level.