Table 1. Data-sharing features for funders with a data-sharing policy.
Non-commercial funders (N = 30) | Commercial funders (N = 41) | |
---|---|---|
Mention of data sharing policy starting date | 11 (37%) | 17 (41%) |
Data request methods | ||
Through data-sharing platform/data enclave/dedicated portal/repositories | 16 (53%) | 30 (73%) |
By contacting trial investigators | 0 (0%) | 3(7%) |
Mention of data-sharing platforms: | ||
VIVLI | 0 (0%) | 6(15%) |
YODA | 0 (0%) | 1(2%) |
CSDR | 1(3%) | 10(24%) |
SOAR | 0 (0%) | 1(2%) |
Type of shared data or documents mentioned? | ||
IPD | 2(7%) | 33(80%) |
Code | 0 (0%) | 1(2%) |
Other documents | 1 (3%) | 31 (76%) |
Data request review panel | ||
Independent | 0 (0%) | 15(37%) |
Internal review panel | 1 (3%) | 5 (12%) |
Both | 0 (0%) | 6 (15%) |
Specialist committee | 0 (0%) | 2 (5%) |
Restriction of data availability time? | 1 (3%) | 2 (5%) |
Specify time frames for data-sharing | 9 (30%) | 0(0%) |
Existence of sanctions for non-compliance with policies? | 15 (50%) | 0(0%) |
Reward for sharing data? | 0 (0%) | 0(0%) |
Specific funding for data sharing? | 13 (43%) | 0 (0%) |
DORA Signatory? | 12 (40%) | 0 (0%) |
Data are presented as numbers (percentages).