Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 20;15(8):e0237464. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237464

Table 1. Data-sharing features for funders with a data-sharing policy.

Non-commercial funders (N = 30) Commercial funders (N = 41)
Mention of data sharing policy starting date 11 (37%) 17 (41%)
Data request methods
Through data-sharing platform/data enclave/dedicated portal/repositories 16 (53%) 30 (73%)
By contacting trial investigators 0 (0%) 3(7%)
Mention of data-sharing platforms:
VIVLI 0 (0%) 6(15%)
YODA 0 (0%) 1(2%)
CSDR 1(3%) 10(24%)
SOAR 0 (0%) 1(2%)
Type of shared data or documents mentioned?
IPD 2(7%) 33(80%)
Code 0 (0%) 1(2%)
Other documents 1 (3%) 31 (76%)
Data request review panel
Independent 0 (0%) 15(37%)
Internal review panel 1 (3%) 5 (12%)
Both 0 (0%) 6 (15%)
Specialist committee 0 (0%) 2 (5%)
Restriction of data availability time? 1 (3%) 2 (5%)
Specify time frames for data-sharing 9 (30%) 0(0%)
Existence of sanctions for non-compliance with policies? 15 (50%) 0(0%)
Reward for sharing data? 0 (0%) 0(0%)
Specific funding for data sharing? 13 (43%) 0 (0%)
DORA Signatory? 12 (40%) 0 (0%)

Data are presented as numbers (percentages).