Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 24;15(8):e0237779. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237779

Table 4. Predictive performance of different approaches based on the variance-stability transformation for dataset 1.

Dataset 1, including random effect W Dataset 1, excluding random effect W
Method ER (SD) AUC (SD) AUPRC (SD) ER (SD) AUC (SD) AUPRC (SD)
Oracle 0.04 (0.02) 0.98 (0.02) 0.97 (0.03) 0.04 (0.02) 0.98 (0.02) 0.32 (0.1)
LASSO 0.21 (0.05) 0.87 (0.04) 0.87 (0.07) 0.22 (0.05) 0.86 (0.05) 0.86 (0.07)
ZINB+GLM 0.24 (0.06) 0.82 (0.06) 0.82 (0.09) 0.25 (0.06) 0.81 (0.07) 0.81 (0.09)
TPNB+GLM 0.2 (0.05) 0.87 (0.05) 0.86 (0.08) 0.21 (0.05) 0.86 (0.05) 0.85 (0.09)
NB+GLM 0.23 (0.05) 0.83 (0.05) 0.83 (0.08) 0.24 (0.06) 0.82 (0.06) 0.82 (0.09)
ZINB+LASSO 0.24 (0.06) 0.82 (0.06) 0.82 (0.09) 0.25 (0.06) 0.81 (0.07) 0.81 (0.09)
TPNB+LASSO 0.2 (0.05) 0.87 (0.05) 0.86 (0.08) 0.21 (0.05) 0.86 (0.05) 0.85 (0.09)
NB+LASSO 0.23 (0.05) 0.83 (0.05) 0.83 (0.08) 0.24 (0.06) 0.82 (0.06) 0.82 (0.09)