Table 4.
Results from multinomial model estimates of the relationship between higher levels of W1 TD and the odds of W1 current users being classified within each W2 product use category relative to the same level of use as W1.
Product | Product Status | N | % | SE | Estimate | SE | t | P |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cigarette Only | ||||||||
No Change | 4553 | 65.0% | 0.6 % | - | - | - | - | |
Adding | 1786 | 24.1 % | 0.6 % | 0.09 | 0.03 | 3.11 | 0.00 | |
Switching | 222 | 7.7 % | 0.4 % | −0.39 | 0.08 | −4.57 | 0.00 | |
Quit | 505 | 3.1 % | 0.2 % | −0.79 | 0.07 | −10.78 | 0.00 | |
E-Cigarette Only | ||||||||
No Change | 178 | 49.7% | 2.5 % | - | - | - | - | |
Adding | 79 | 21.9 % | 2.0 % | 0.22 | 0.16 | 1.40 | 0.16 | |
Switching | 50 | 15.3 % | 2.2 % | 0.10 | 0.19 | 0.52 | 0.61 | |
Quit | 58 | 13.1 % | 1.7 % | −0.27 | 0.30 | −0.90 | 0.37 | |
Cigar Only | ||||||||
No Change | 179 | 36.1% | 2.4 % | - | - | - | - | |
Adding | 152 | 25.0% | 2.0 % | 0.66 | 0.14 | 4.65 | 0.00 | |
Switching | 108 | 22.9 % | 2.2 % | 0.56 | 0.15 | 3.75 | 0.00 | |
Quit | 145 | 16.0% | 1.8 % | 0.30 | 0.19 | 1.63 | 0.10 | |
Hookah Only | ||||||||
No Change | 102 | 27.3% | 2.7 % | - | - | - | - | |
Adding | 84 | 23.7% | 2.9 % | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.97 | 0.33 | |
Switching | 74 | 29.5 % | 2.5 % | 0.00 | 0.25 | −0.02 | 0.98 | |
Quit | 106 | 19.5 % | 2.1 % | 0.12 | 0.18 | 0.68 | 0.49 | |
Smokeless Only | ||||||||
No Change | 484 | 64.5% | 1.8 % | - | - | - | - | |
Adding | 169 | 19.4% | 1.5 % | −0.10 | 0.12 | −0.82 | 0.41 | |
Switching | 41 | 11.4 % | 1.4 % | −0.53 | 0.26 | −2.05 | 0.04 | |
Quit | 78 | 4.8% | 0.7 % | −0.32 | 0.17 | −1.87 | 0.06 |
Note: Sample sizes are unweighted. Weighted estimates adjusted for gender, age, and racial/ethnic group. Weighted estimates of W1 TD are scaled within each user group to reflect increases in standard deviations.