Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 25;15(8):e0238103. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238103

Table 3. The effect of clinicopathological factors on recurrence and non-adjusted and adjusted hazard ratio among OSCC patients.

Cox proportional-hazards regression analysis of recurrence
Recurrence Univariate analysis (crude) Multiple analysis (adjusted)
Total N % Hazard ratio 95% CI P-value Hazard ratio 95% CI P-value
Stage 1 988 160 16.1 1.000
2 460 88 19.1 1.235 0.952–1.603 0.111
3 215 35 16.2 1.085 0.752–1.564 0.663
4 824 220 26.7 1.954 1.593–2.396 <0.001
T stage 1 1110 188 16.9 1.000 0.158–2.566 0.526
2 600 126 21.0 1.322 0.208–3.405 0.810
3 151 28 18.5 1.301 0.198–3.481 0.798
4 668 170 25.4 1.749 0.276–4.489 0.880
N stage 0 1416 209 14.8 1.000
1 182 46 25.3 1.851 1.345–2.547 <0.001 1.523 1.019 - 2.276 0.040
2 309 111 35.9 3.174 2.520–3.999 <0.001 2.426 1.629 - 3.613 <0.001
3 30 10 33.3 5.259 2.777–9.962 <0.001 3.140 0.939 - 10.500 0.063
Extranodal spread No 1669 266 15.9 1.000 1.000
Yes 268 102 38.0 3.156 2.509–3.970 <0.001 1.666 1.129 - 2.458 0.010
Close margin No 2455 491 20.0 1.000
Yes 80 23 28.8 1.527 1.005–2.320 0.047
Grade Well 435 60 13.8 1.000 1.000
Moderately 1964 405 20.6 1.672 1.275–2.194 <0.001 1.167 0.793 - 1.715 0.433
Poor 136 42 30.9 3.029 2.041–4.495 <0.001 1.973 1.167 - 3.336 0.011

Following period was from time at OSCC diagnosed to June 30, 2019.