Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 8;98(8):skaa250. doi: 10.1093/jas/skaa250

Table 3.

Predictive MAE, MASE, RMSE, and R2 for the DL architecture for BW, MD, and BF for the three genetic lines evaluated on different validation schemes

Trait Validation Schemes1 Line MAE MASE RMSE R 2
BW, kg Line 1 4.86 4.22 6.34 0.68
Line 2 4.27 3.57 6.05 0.67
Line 3 4.33 3.38 5.40 0.71
3F-CV 1 4.26 3.70 5.43 0.78
3F-CV 2 3.99 3.35 5.70 0.68
3F-CV 3 3.58 2.80 4.44 0.81
5F-CV 1 3.46 3.02 4.74 0.81
5F-CV 2 3.29 2.77 4.95 0.78
5F-CV 3 2.78 2.17 3.58 0.87
MD, mm Line 1 4.17 6.84 5.22 0.13
Line 2 5.20 7.63 6.43 0.05
Line 3 4.04 6.17 4.95 0.10
3F-CV 1 4.45 7.08 5.40 0.10
3F-CV 2 5.15 7.75 6.44 0.04
3F-CV 3 4.04 6.17 5.00 0.08
5F-CV 1 3.39 5.50 4.38 0.36
5F-CV 2 3.57 5.27 4.83 0.39
5F-CV 3 3.04 4.62 4.00 0.41
BF, mm Line 1 0.97 15.15 1.22 0.20
Line 2 1.22 20.47 1.55 0.03
Line 3 1.20 19.80 1.47 0.06
3F-CV 1 1.00 16.43 1.22 0.22
3F-CV 2 1.12 18.69 1.41 0.19
3F-CV 3 1.11 18.03 1.39 0.17
5F-CV 1 0.81 13.16 1.05 0.41
5F-CV 2 0.85 14.19 1.15 0.47
5F-CV 3 0.89 14.39 1.21 0.36

1Retaining one line for validation (Line), a 3-fold (3F-CV), and a 5-fold (5F-CV) CV.