Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 9;2(1):vdaa085. doi: 10.1093/noajnl/vdaa085

Table 2.

Efficacy of median recurrent cutoff and previously published newly diagnosed cutoffs (Neal et al.24) for discriminating OS and PFS across all treatment groups

Treatment group Median cutoffs P value Neal cutoffs P value
DG T1Gd OS All treatments 106.7 .00114 78 9.25E−05
BevAlone 134.4 .18 78 .21
BevCyto 95.9 .00036 78 9.25E−05
PFS All treatments 106.7 .00063 93 .00011
BevAlone 134.4 .059 93 .078
BevCyto 95.9 .00085 93 .00085
DG FLAIR OS All treatments 74.4 .80 78 .54
BevAlone 121.3 .74 78 .80
BevCyto 57.8 .55 78 .33
PFS All treatments 74.4 .51 93 .25
BevAlone 121.3 .91 93 .62
BevCyto 57.8 .10 93 .08

Analysis was performed for both T1Gd- and FLAIR-based DG scores. Significant log-rank test P values underlined.