Table 3.

Cox proportional hazards regression analysis of OS and PFS using continuous DG_T1Gd scores, patient age at the start of treatment, and patient sex

		Model	Variable	HR	95% CI	P value
OS	BevAlone	Univariate	25 DG T1Gd	0.985	[0.954, 1.016]	.333
		Multivariate	25 DG T1Gd	0.988	[0.950, 1.027]	.543
			Age	1.017	[0.973, 1.062]	.459
			Sex (M)	3.618	[1.137, 11.509]	.029
	BevCyto	Univariate	25 DG T1Gd	0.879	[0.809, 0.955]	.002
		Multivariate	25 DG T1Gd	0.875	[0.802, 0.956]	.003
			Age	1.008	[0.981, 1.037]	.559
			Sex (M)	1.859	[0.840, 4.118]	.126
PFS	BevAlone	Univariate	25 DG T1Gd	0.960	[0.925, 0.997]	.034
		Multivariate	25 DG T1Gd	0.956	[0.917, 0.998]	.038
			Age	1.017	[0.972, 1.064]	.456
			Sex (M)	3.995	[1.306, 12.217]	.015
	BevCyto	Univariate	25 DG T1Gd	0.872	[0.798, 0.953]	.002
		Multivariate	25 DG T1Gd	0.877	[0.801, 0.960]	.004
			Age	1.007	[0.981, 1.033]	.620
			Sex (M)	1.610	[0.726, 3.567]	.241

Significant P values underlined.