Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Aug 25.
Published in final edited form as: Surv Res Methods. 2019 Dec 10;13(3):289–304.

Table 2.

Logistic Regression of Linkage Consent on Respondent Subgroups and Interactions Between Experimental Conditions and Respondent Subgroups.

Interaction terms
Main effect terms
Time savings
Improved study value
Covariates Coef. SE Coef. SE Coef. SE
Experimental conditions
 Control ref. - - - - -
 Time savings −0.50 0.30 - - - -
 Improved study value −0.26 0.31 - - - -
Control variables
Age (in years)
 15–32 ref. - - - - -
 33–45 0.002 0.14 - - - -
 46–53 0.08 0.15 - - - -
 54–84 0.21 0.15 - - - -
Sex
 Male ref. - - - - -
 Female 0.29* 0.11 - - - -
Immigrant background
 Yes −0.15 0.11 - - - -
 No ref. - - - - -
Hypothesized indicators
Actual weekly working hours
 25 or less ref. - ref. - ref. -
 25–39 0.14 0.22 0.04 0.30 −0.20 0.30
 40 or more −0.16 0.20 0.56* 0.28 0.44 0.27
# of children
 0 ref. - ref. - ref. -
 1 −0.21 0.20 0.20 0.29 −0.12 0.27
 2 or more −0.38 0.20 0.91* 0.29 0.42 0.29
Education
 Low ref. - ref. - ref. -
 Intermediate 0.10 0.21 0.51* 0.26 0.25 0.30
 High 0.31 0.21 0.11 0.27 0.05 0.30
# of worker’s rights withheld
 0 ref. - ref. - ref. -
 1 or more −0.05 0.23 0.07 0.29 −0.19 0.31
 Intercept term 1.49* 0.26 - - - -
*

p < 0.05, two-sided