Appendix 7—table 1. Comparison between the generic confocal CNN model (default in PlantSeg), the closest confocal model in terms of xy plant voxels resolution ds3 confocal and the combination of ds3 confocal and rescaling (in order to mach the training data resolution a rescaling factor of zxy has been used).
The later combination showed the best overall results. To be noted that ds3 confocal was trained on almost isotropic data, while the 3D Digital Tissue Atlas is not isotropic. Therefore poor performances without rescaling are expected. Segmentation obtained with GASP and default parameters
| Dataset | Generic confocal (Default) | ds3 confocal | ds3 confocal + rescaling | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARand | VOIsplit | VOImerge | ARand | VOIsplit | VOImerge | ARand | VOIsplit | VOImerge | |
| Anther | 0.328 | 0.778 | 0.688 | 0.344 | 1.407 | 0.735 | 0.265 | 0.748 | 0.650 |
| Filament | 0.576 | 1.001 | 1.378 | 0.563 | 1.559 | 1.244 | 0.232 | 0.608 | 0.601 |
| Leaf | 0.075 | 0.353 | 0.322 | 0.118 | 0.718 | 0.384 | 0.149 | 0.361 | 0.342 |
| Pedicel | 0.400 | 0.787 | 0.869 | 0.395 | 1.447 | 1.082 | 0.402 | 0.807 | 1.161 |
| Root | 0.248 | 0.634 | 0.882 | 0.219 | 1.193 | 0.761 | 0.123 | 0.442 | 0.592 |
| Sepal | 0.527 | 0.746 | 1.032 | 0.503 | 1.293 | 1.281 | 0.713 | 0.652 | 1.615 |
| Valve | 0.572 | 0.821 | 1.315 | 0.617 | 1.404 | 1.548 | 0.586 | 0.578 | 1.443 |
| Average | 0.389 | 0.731 | 0.927 | 0.394 | 1.289 | 1.005 | 0.353 | 0.600 | 0.915 |