Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 29;9:e57613. doi: 10.7554/eLife.57613

Appendix 7—table 1. Comparison between the generic confocal CNN model (default in PlantSeg), the closest confocal model in terms of xy plant voxels resolution ds3 confocal and the combination of ds3 confocal and rescaling (in order to mach the training data resolution a rescaling factor of (3,1,1) zxy has been used).

The later combination showed the best overall results. To be noted that ds3 confocal was trained on almost isotropic data, while the 3D Digital Tissue Atlas is not isotropic. Therefore poor performances without rescaling are expected. Segmentation obtained with GASP and default parameters

Dataset Generic confocal (Default) ds3 confocal ds3 confocal + rescaling
ARand VOIsplit VOImerge ARand VOIsplit VOImerge ARand VOIsplit VOImerge
Anther 0.328 0.778 0.688 0.344 1.407 0.735 0.265 0.748 0.650
Filament 0.576 1.001 1.378 0.563 1.559 1.244 0.232 0.608 0.601
Leaf 0.075 0.353 0.322 0.118 0.718 0.384 0.149 0.361 0.342
Pedicel 0.400 0.787 0.869 0.395 1.447 1.082 0.402 0.807 1.161
Root 0.248 0.634 0.882 0.219 1.193 0.761 0.123 0.442 0.592
Sepal 0.527 0.746 1.032 0.503 1.293 1.281 0.713 0.652 1.615
Valve 0.572 0.821 1.315 0.617 1.404 1.548 0.586 0.578 1.443
Average 0.389 0.731 0.927 0.394 1.289 1.005 0.353 0.600 0.915