Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 29;9:e57613. doi: 10.7554/eLife.57613

Appendix 7—table 2. Comparison between the results obtained with three different over/under segmentation factor (0.5,0.6,0.7).

The effect of tuning this parameter is mostly reflected in the VOIs scores. In this case the best result have been obtained by steering the segmentation towards the over segmentation.

ds3 confocal + rescaling
Dataset Over/under factor 0.5 Over/under factor 0.6 (Default) Over/under factor 0.7
ARand VOIsplit VOImerge ARand VOIsplit VOImerge ARand VOIsplit VOImerge
Anther 0.548 0.540 1.131 0.265 0.748 0.650 0.215 1.130 0.517
Filament 0.740 0.417 1.843 0.232 0.608 0.601 0.159 0.899 0.350
Leaf 0.326 0.281 0.825 0.149 0.361 0.342 0.117 0.502 0.247
Pedicel 0.624 0.585 2.126 0.402 0.807 1.161 0.339 1.148 0.894
Root 0.244 0.334 0.972 0.123 0.442 0.592 0.113 0.672 0.485
Sepal 0.904 0.494 2.528 0.713 0.652 1.615 0.346 0.926 1.211
Valve 0.831 0.432 2.207 0.586 0.578 1.443 0.444 0.828 1.138
Average 0.602 0.441 1.662 0.353 0.600 0.915 0.248 0.872 0.691