Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 29;9:e57613. doi: 10.7554/eLife.57613

Appendix 7—table 3. Comparison between 2D vs 3D super pixels.

From out experiments, segmentation quality is almost always improved by the usage of 3D super pixels. On the other side, the user should be aware that this improvement comes at the cost of a large slow-down of the pipeline (roughly × 4.5 on our system Intel Xenon E5-2660, RAM 252 Gb).

ds3 confocal + rescaling
Over/under factor 0.7
Dataset Super Pixels 2D (Default) Super Pixels 3D
ARand VOIsplit VOImerge time (s) ARand VOIsplit VOImerge time (s)
Anther 0.215 1.130 0.517 600 0.167 0.787 0.399 2310
Filament 0.159 0.899 0.350 120 0.171 0.687 0.487 520
Leaf 0.117 0.502 0.247 800 0.080 0.308 0.220 3650
Pedicel 0.339 1.148 0.894 450 0.314 0.845 0.604 2120
Root 0.113 0.672 0.485 210 0.101 0.356 0.412 920
Sepal 0.346 0.926 1.211 770 0.257 0.690 0.966 3420
Valve 0.444 0.828 1.138 530 0.300 0.494 0.875 2560
Average 0.248 0.872 0.691 500 0.199 0.595 0.566 2210